Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 51

Thread: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

  1. #1
    Somebody Guest

    Default when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?


  2. #2
    Bryan Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On Saturday, October 6, 2012 11:55:51 PM UTC-5, Somebody wrote:
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA


    The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no one else even comes close.

    --Bryan

  3. #3
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Bryan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..

    > The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no
    > one else even comes close.


    lol

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KP9PNSUME4



  4. #4
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Bryan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > On Saturday, October 6, 2012 11:55:51 PM UTC-5, Somebody wrote:
    >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA

    >
    > The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no
    > one else even comes close.
    >
    > --Bryan



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EBw_da7BZk



  5. #5
    Roy Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On Sunday, October 7, 2012 4:04:33 PM UTC-6, Somebody wrote:
    > "Bryan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >
    > news:[email protected]..
    >
    >
    >
    > > The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no

    >
    > > one else even comes close.

    >
    >
    >
    > lol
    >
    >
    >
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KP9PNSUME4


    And this has to do with food I suppose.

  6. #6
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Roy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KP9PNSUME4

    >
    > And this has to do with food I suppose.



    we are what we eat.



  7. #7
    gloria p Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >
    >



    When they became Old Men.

    Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    most of whom detest current rock.

    gloria p

  8. #8
    Cheri Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "gloria p" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:k4t4pg$qm1$[email protected]..
    > On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >>
    >>

    >
    >
    > When they became Old Men.
    >
    > Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    > most of whom detest current rock.
    >
    > gloria p



    Not really true at all.

    Cheri


  9. #9
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Cheri" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > "gloria p" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:k4t4pg$qm1$[email protected]..
    >> On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >> When they became Old Men.
    >>
    >> Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    >> most of whom detest current rock.
    >>
    >> gloria p

    >
    >
    > Not really true at all.
    >
    > Cheri



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMjUSrYfyak



  10. #10
    sf Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:55:27 -0600, gloria p <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    > >
    > >

    >
    >
    > When they became Old Men.
    >
    > Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    > most of whom detest current rock.
    >

    I'd agree completely, except for some reason generations still seem to
    bond over them. We took our kids to a Rolling Stones concert when
    they were teenagers and now our 11 year old grandson wants to listen
    to a Rolling Stones CD every time he rides in our car... so they are
    definitely a cross generational band.

    --
    I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

  11. #11
    Cheri Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "sf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:55:27 -0600, gloria p <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >> >
    >> >

    >>
    >>
    >> When they became Old Men.
    >>
    >> Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    >> most of whom detest current rock.
    >>

    > I'd agree completely, except for some reason generations still seem to
    > bond over them. We took our kids to a Rolling Stones concert when
    > they were teenagers and now our 11 year old grandson wants to listen
    > to a Rolling Stones CD every time he rides in our car... so they are
    > definitely a cross generational band.


    True, same with our grandkids...they all love The Stones, ages 12 to 27.

    Cheri


  12. #12
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Cheri" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > "gloria p" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:k4t4pg$qm1$[email protected]..
    >> On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >> When they became Old Men.
    >>
    >> Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    >> most of whom detest current rock.
    >>
    >> gloria p

    >
    >
    > Not really true at all.
    >
    > Cheri



    But Keith had this to say:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1ObhEIEj98



  13. #13
    James Silverton Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On 10/8/2012 5:18 PM, Somebody wrote:
    > "Cheri" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]..
    >> "gloria p" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >> news:k4t4pg$qm1$[email protected]..
    >>> On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> When they became Old Men.
    >>>
    >>> Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    >>> most of whom detest current rock.
    >>>
    >>> gloria p

    >>
    >>
    >> Not really true at all.
    >>
    >> Cheri

    >
    >
    > But Keith had this to say:
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1ObhEIEj98
    >
    >

    I'm pretty old and my only recollection of the Rolling Stones is a vague
    notion that they might have been some sort of rock "music" band.

    --
    Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

    Extraneous "not" in Reply To.

  14. #14
    Chemo Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On Oct 7, 8:35*am, Bryan <bryangsimm...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Saturday, October 6, 2012 11:55:51 PM UTC-5, Somebody wrote:
    > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA

    >
    > The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no one else even comes close.
    >
    > --Bryan


    I think the Beatles were.

  15. #15
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Chemo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    On Oct 7, 8:35 am, Bryan <bryangsimm...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Saturday, October 6, 2012 11:55:51 PM UTC-5, Somebody wrote:
    > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA

    >
    > The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no
    > one else even comes close.
    >
    > --Bryan


    I think the Beatles were.

    ---

    Jesus...



  16. #16
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "James Silverton" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:k4vgd6$ue3$[email protected]..
    > I'm pretty old and my only recollection of the Rolling Stones is a vague
    > notion that they might have been some sort of rock "music" band.


    The band that did Syphathy for the Devil?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dt0ipUCfdlU



  17. #17
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    "Cheri" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > "gloria p" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:k4t4pg$qm1$[email protected]..
    >> On 10/6/2012 10:56 PM, Somebody wrote:
    >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >> When they became Old Men.
    >>
    >> Now they are relevant only to other Old People,
    >> most of whom detest current rock.
    >>
    >> gloria p

    >
    >
    > Not really true at all.
    >
    > Cheri



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dt0ipUCfdlU



  18. #18
    Dave Smith Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On 08/10/2012 5:26 PM, Chemo wrote:
    > On Oct 7, 8:35 am, Bryan <bryangsimm...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> On Saturday, October 6, 2012 11:55:51 PM UTC-5, Somebody wrote:
    >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7mEyjvXKA

    >>
    >> The Rolling Stones are the most relevant Rock'n Roll group ever, and no one else even comes close.
    >>
    >> --Bryan

    >
    > I think the Beatles were.
    >

    I agree. The Stones were great in the early 60s. Then their music went
    downhill fast IMO. The Beatles were incredibly versatile and set new
    standards for rock music. Unfortunately, the fame got the better of
    them and they simply could not perform publicly. I can understand their
    feelings on that, having been to a Beatles concert and not being able to
    hear a note. They broke up in the early 70s and half the band has died,
    but their music is still enjoyed by a wide variety of people.

  19. #19
    Colt T Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    I liked pre plane crash Lynyrd Skynyrd best.


  20. #20
    dsi1 Guest

    Default Re: when did the Rolling Stones stop being relevant?

    On 10/8/2012 12:37 PM, Colt T wrote:
    > I liked pre plane crash Lynyrd Skynyrd best.
    >


    Let's face it, most things are a lot better before a plane crashes.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32