-
On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to inanother thread)
.........but should have.
If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
have few topics to choose from today.
TJ
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
"Tommy Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> ........but should have.
>
> If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
> have few topics to choose from today.
>
> TJ
shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up!... shut up!...
shut up!!!
and get back to work.
(this was only meant for TJ, anyone else-- please move along...)
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to inanother thread)
Somebody wrote:
>
> "Tommy Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > ........but should have.
> >
> > If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
> > have few topics to choose from today.
> >
> > TJ
>
> shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up!... shut up!...
> shut up!!!
>
> and get back to work.
>
> (this was only meant for TJ, anyone else-- please move along...)
YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday that I
just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you posted 88 times,
give or take a couple. WTH? I thought I posted too much (and I
do....someone called me Gabby once), but you take the cake here.
G. :-D
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:45:42 -0400, Gary wrote:
> Somebody wrote:
>>
>> "Tommy Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> ........but should have.
>>>
>>> If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
>>> have few topics to choose from today.
>>>
>>> TJ
>>
>> shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up!... shut up!...
>> shut up!!!
>>
>> and get back to work.
>>
>> (this was only meant for TJ, anyone else-- please move along...)
>
> YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday that I
> just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you posted 88 times,
> give or take a couple. WTH?
Did you count how many of them were informative or useful in some way?
-sw
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
"Gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
> YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday that I
> just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you posted 88 times,
> give or take a couple. WTH? I thought I posted too much (and I
> do....someone called me Gabby once), but you take the cake here.
>
> G. :-D
I hope it's Boston Creme! Or chocolate with Turkey Hill Moose Tracks. (No
offense Moose.)
I got fired for being sick two days for a bus driver job I hated and was
going to hate even more the more I did it... Can I miserate a while?... I
needed that job to retire... ****. *sad face*
Hell, I was so depressed yesterday I invited my ex over!
now, I'm reduce to watching angry Neil Young videos in the basement. Oddly,
it seems to help.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O1v_...eature=related
PS **** you Chemo. Whatever you post is crap and people like you less than
TJ.
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to inanother thread)
On Sep 20, 1:07*pm, "Somebody" <v...@glorious.com> wrote:
> "Gary" <g.maj...@att.net> wrote in messagenews:[email protected]...
> > YOU need to get back to work, dude. *You posted so much yesterday that I
> > just had to run the numbers this morning. *Yesterday you posted 88 times,
> > give or take a couple. *WTH? *I thought I posted too much (and I
> > do....someone called me Gabby once), but you take the cake here.
>
> > G. * :-D
>
> I hope it's Boston Creme! *Or chocolate with Turkey Hill Moose Tracks. *(No
> offense Moose.)
>
> I got fired for being sick two days for a bus driver job I hated and was
> going to hate even more the more I did it... *Can I miserate a while?.... *I
> needed that job to retire... *****. **sad face*
>
> Hell, I was so depressed yesterday I invited my ex over!
>
> now, I'm reduce to watching angry Neil Young videos in the basement. *Oddly,
> it seems to help.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O1v_...eature=related
>
> PS ***** you Chemo. Whatever you post is crap and people like you less than
> TJ.
Now you've really gone and hurt my feelings....Mr. Spilled Salad Man.
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
"Chemo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Now you've really gone and hurt my feelings....Mr. Spilled Salad Man.
---
sorry... wanna get a beer-- I'll buy. But none of that foreign crap...
Pabst Blue Ribbon! We can sit at the bar check out the big titty women
that won't ever **** us.
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to inanother thread)
On Sep 20, 1:23*pm, "Somebody" <v...@glorious.com> wrote:
> "Chemo" <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> Now you've really gone and hurt my feelings....Mr. Spilled Salad Man.
>
> ---
>
> sorry... *wanna get a beer-- I'll buy. *But none of that foreign crap....
> Pabst Blue Ribbon! * *We can sit at the bar check out the big titty women
> that won't ever **** us.
I get off work in an hour.
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
"Chemo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]m...
I get off work in an hour.
===
I got off work two weeks ago.
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded toin another thread)
On 21/09/2012 6:23 AM, Somebody wrote:
> "Chemo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> Now you've really gone and hurt my feelings....Mr. Spilled Salad Man.
>
> ---
>
> sorry... wanna get a beer-- I'll buy. But none of that foreign crap...
> Pabst Blue Ribbon! We can sit at the bar check out the big titty women
> that won't ever **** us.
>
>
Make mine a Victoria Bitter!
http://www.victoriabitter.com.au/
--
Krypsis
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded toin another thread)
On 21/09/2012 5:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:45:42 -0400, Gary wrote:
>
>> Somebody wrote:
>>>
>>> "Tommy Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> ........but should have.
>>>>
>>>> If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
>>>> have few topics to choose from today.
>>>>
>>>> TJ
>>>
>>> shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up!... shut up!...
>>> shut up!!!
>>>
>>> and get back to work.
>>>
>>> (this was only meant for TJ, anyone else-- please move along...)
>>
>> YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday that I
>> just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you posted 88 times,
>> give or take a couple. WTH?
>
> Did you count how many of them were informative or useful in some way?
>
> -sw
>
Then we'd be comparing his posts to yours! Why bother?
--
Krypsis
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:07:29 -0400, Somebody wrote:
> I got fired for being sick two days for a bus driver job I hated and was
> going to hate even more the more I did it... Can I miserate a while?... I
> needed that job to retire... ****. *sad face*
Good for you. Have you considered a shotgun? It sure beats taking
your childish, drunken misery out on RFC and making a compete fool of
yourself. Now if we could only time it so Andy has his yearly
meltdown right about now, it might be an entertaining group.
> Hell, I was so depressed yesterday I invited my ex over!
No ****. You only mentioned him like... 10 times.
I'm beginning to think Tom here is Mr. Bread Basket/MMkay from
alt.food.barbecue.
-sw
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
"Krypsis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:k3fv1s$700$[email protected]..
> Make mine a Victoria Bitter!
>
> http://www.victoriabitter.com.au/
run it on my tab.
have you ever had Henry Weinhards blue boar pale ale?
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
Krypsis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 21/09/2012 5:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:45:42 -0400, Gary wrote:
>>> YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday
>>> that I just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you
>>> posted 88 times, give or take a couple. WTH?
>>
>> Did you count how many of them were informative or useful in some
>> way? -sw
>>
> Then we'd be comparing his posts to yours! Why bother?
It's actually a big problem when a kook floods a group with trolls, but I
realize that's too complex for you to grasp. Better you just hand out your
stupid little snipes twenty times a day and avoid bothering to understand
the conversation. Does that about sum it up?
Maybe you can find something better to do than stalk a person who blows you
away in every facet of cooking and creativity. Your foolish "critiques" come
off as unbelievably ignorant and hypocritical, with more than a touch of
jealousy.
Idiot.
MartyB
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
Sqwertz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:07:29 -0400, Somebody wrote:
>
>> I got fired for being sick two days for a bus driver job I hated and
>> was going to hate even more the more I did it... Can I miserate a
>> while?... I needed that job to retire... ****. *sad face*
>
> Good for you. Have you considered a shotgun? It sure beats taking
> your childish, drunken misery out on RFC and making a compete fool of
> yourself. Now if we could only time it so Andy has his yearly
> meltdown right about now, it might be an entertaining group.
>
>> Hell, I was so depressed yesterday I invited my ex over!
>
> No ****. You only mentioned him like... 10 times.
>
> I'm beginning to think Tom here is Mr. Bread Basket/MMkay from
> alt.food.barbecue.
>
> -sw
Is that the same pest as the Library troll freak?
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
Gary <[email protected]> wrote:
> Somebody wrote:
>>
>> "Tommy Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> ........but should have.
>>>
>>> If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
>>> have few topics to choose from today.
>>>
>>> TJ
>>
>> shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up!... shut
>> up!... shut up!!!
>>
>> and get back to work.
>>
>> (this was only meant for TJ, anyone else-- please move along...)
>
> YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday
> that I just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you
> posted 88 times, give or take a couple. WTH? I thought I posted too
> much (and I do....someone called me Gabby once), but you take the
> cake here.
>
> G. :-D
May I suggest that you and everyone else who is sick of this ass-ignorant
flooding kook write to Eternal-September and complain.
[email protected]. Be sure to include a set of headers from one of
kookboy's posts. They aren't in the censorship business, but this kook is
exceptionally obnoxious and is ruining the NG for legitimate followers.
If you write to them, just calmly explain the situation with the
understanding that it's not their fault, but it is within their power to cut
the problem off.
MartyB
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:23:23 -0500, "Nunya Bidnits"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Gary <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Somebody wrote:
>>>
>>> "Tommy Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> ........but should have.
>>>>
>>>> If everyone from the beginning of time stayed on topic, we would
>>>> have few topics to choose from today.
>>>>
>>>> TJ
>>>
>>> shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up... shut up!... shut
>>> up!... shut up!!!
>>>
>>> and get back to work.
>>>
>>> (this was only meant for TJ, anyone else-- please move along...)
>>
>> YOU need to get back to work, dude. You posted so much yesterday
>> that I just had to run the numbers this morning. Yesterday you
>> posted 88 times, give or take a couple. WTH? I thought I posted too
>> much (and I do....someone called me Gabby once), but you take the
>> cake here.
>>
>> G. :-D
>
>May I suggest that you and everyone else who is sick of this ass-ignorant
>flooding kook write to Eternal-September and complain.
>[email protected] Be sure to include a set of headers from one of
>kookboy's posts. They aren't in the censorship business, but this kook is
>exceptionally obnoxious and is ruining the NG for legitimate followers.
>
>If you write to them, just calmly explain the situation with the
>understanding that it's not their fault, but it is within their power to cut
>the problem off.
>
>MartyB
In MartyB's land of the free, even unmoderated newsgroups will be
censored.
John
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:21:41 -0500, Nunya Bidnits wrote:
> Sqwertz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:07:29 -0400, Somebody wrote:
>>
>>> I got fired for being sick two days for a bus driver job I hated and
>>> was going to hate even more the more I did it... Can I miserate a
>>> while?... I needed that job to retire... ****. *sad face*
>>
>> Good for you. Have you considered a shotgun? It sure beats taking
>> your childish, drunken misery out on RFC and making a compete fool of
>> yourself. Now if we could only time it so Andy has his yearly
>> meltdown right about now, it might be an entertaining group.
>>
>>> Hell, I was so depressed yesterday I invited my ex over!
>>
>> No ****. You only mentioned him like... 10 times.
>>
>> I'm beginning to think Tom here is Mr. Bread Basket/MMkay from
>> alt.food.barbecue.
>
> Is that the same pest as the Library troll freak?
No, The Kitchener Library Troll is none other than Moose in Love. Not
the new, forging, Malfie version of Moose in Love but your 'ol buddy
John John. Having trouble keeping up with all the nymshifting trolls
are ya? It *is* tough sometimes, but I got your back.
-sw
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:12:14 -0500, Sqwertz <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:21:41 -0500, Nunya Bidnits wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:07:29 -0400, Somebody wrote:
>>>
>>>> I got fired for being sick two days for a bus driver job I hated and
>>>> was going to hate even more the more I did it... Can I miserate a
>>>> while?... I needed that job to retire... ****. *sad face*
>>>
>>> Good for you. Have you considered a shotgun? It sure beats taking
>>> your childish, drunken misery out on RFC and making a compete fool of
>>> yourself. Now if we could only time it so Andy has his yearly
>>> meltdown right about now, it might be an entertaining group.
>>>
>>>> Hell, I was so depressed yesterday I invited my ex over!
>>>
>>> No ****. You only mentioned him like... 10 times.
>>>
>>> I'm beginning to think Tom here is Mr. Bread Basket/MMkay from
>>> alt.food.barbecue.
>>
>> Is that the same pest as the Library troll freak?
>
>No, The Kitchener Library Troll is none other than Moose in Love. Not
>the new, forging, Malfie version of Moose in Love but your 'ol buddy
>John John. Having trouble keeping up with all the nymshifting trolls
>are ya? It *is* tough sometimes, but I got your back.
OK, I'll admit it. I shot JR.
John
-
Re: On Topic post about Off Topic Posts (that no one responded to in another thread)
"John John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> OK, I'll admit it. I shot JR.
>
> John
I think I got the Simpson's Road Rage figured out... Jesus-- electronics!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules