Thread: Tiger Woods in auto accident

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html

Well...he might have been eating something.

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>
> Well...he might have been eating something.

I thought that he was supposed to be a good driver :-)
Glad to hear he is going to be OK.

On Nov 27, 1:54*pm, Dave Smith <adavid.sm...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>
> > Well...he might have been eating something.
>
> I thought that he was supposed to be a good driver :-)
> Glad to hear he is going to be OK.

The police say that charges may be pending.....so who knows what was
up.

On Nov 27, 3:29*pm, Chemo the Clown <an...@peak.org> wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>
> Well...he might have been eating something.

Yeah that big dick in his mouth was probably distracting.

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>
> Well...he might have been eating something.

You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
to a billion dollars?

You are .... a sad person.

On Nov 27, 2:33*pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>
> > Well...he might have been eating something.
>
> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
> to a billion dollars?
>
> You are .... a sad person.

Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?

On Nov 27, 2:15*pm, projectile vomit chick
<projektilevomitch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 3:29*pm, Chemo the Clown <an...@peak.org> wrote:
>
> >http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>
> > Well...he might have been eating something.
>
> Yeah that big dick in his mouth was probably distracting.

Wassa matta...didn't get enough turkey yesterday?

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>> to a billion dollars?
>>
>> You are .... a sad person.
>
> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?


Umm.. okay.

You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
agree with...

Congratulations.

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie<bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>
>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>
>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>> to a billion dollars?
>>
>> You are .... a sad person.
>
> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?

He's dumb..and jealous.

Rob

On Nov 27, 2:51*pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
> >>> Well...he might have been eating something.
> >> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
> >> to a billion dollars?
>
> >> You are .... a sad person.
>
> > Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
> > You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>
> Umm.. okay.
>
> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
> * agree with...
>
> Congratulations.

You must be speaking for yourself....

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>> You are .... a sad person.
>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>> Umm.. okay.
>>
>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
>> agree with...
>>
>> Congratulations.
>
> You must be speaking for yourself....


Need conformation for your stupidity?

Rob wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie<bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>>
>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>>
>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>
>>> You are .... a sad person.
>>
>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>
> He's dumb..and jealous.
>
> Rob

And you... You exist to be found by your partner sock.

I really feel sad for you.

You don't really exist. And your master? He/she is as pathetic as you.
Sad is sad. Your value is none.

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>> You are .... a sad person.
>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>> Umm.. okay.
>>
>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
>> agree with...
>>
>> Congratulations.
>
> You must be speaking for yourself....

And you? Who do you speak for?

On Nov 27, 3:09*pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
> >>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
> >>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
> >>>> to a billion dollars?
> >>>> You are .... a sad person.
> >>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
> >>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
> >> Umm.. okay.
>
> >> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
> >> * agree with...
>
> >> Congratulations.
>
> > You must be speaking for yourself....
>
> And you? Who do you speak for?

I never claimed to speak for anyone but you seemed to when you said:
> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has
close
> to a billion dollars?

You seem speaking for those that you seem to think don't care.

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 3:09 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>>>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>>>> You are .... a sad person.
>>>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>>>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>>>> Umm.. okay.
>>>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
>>>> agree with...
>>>> Congratulations.
>>> You must be speaking for yourself....
>> And you? Who do you speak for?
>
> I never claimed to speak for anyone but you seemed to when you said:
> > You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has
> close
>> to a billion dollars?
>
> You seem speaking for those that you seem to think don't care.


The point you never made?

I choose to not be "not nice" to you... but you still have little detail
as to why I should.

Do you have a point?

On Nov 27, 3:28*pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 3:09 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
> >>>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
> >>>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that hasclose
> >>>>>> to a billion dollars?
> >>>>>> You are .... a sad person.
> >>>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread..
> >>>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
> >>>> Umm.. okay.
> >>>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
> >>>> * agree with...
> >>>> Congratulations.
> >>> You must be speaking for yourself....
> >> And you? Who do you speak for?
>
> > *I never claimed to speak for anyone but you seemed to when you said:
> > *> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has
> > close
> >> to a billion dollars?
>
> > You seem *speaking for those that you seem to think don't care.
>
> The point you never made?
>
> I choose to not be "not nice" to you... but you still have little detail
> as to why I should.
>
> Do you have a point?

Do you? I think not other than to try and impress yourself.

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:48:35 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
<andyt@peak.org> wrote:

>On Nov 27, 2:33*pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>> >http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>
>> > Well...he might have been eating something.
>>
>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>> to a billion dollars?
>>
>> You are .... a sad person.
>
>Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?

Pathetic envy.

Tiger is good for golf, perhaps to some a silly game, but an awful lot
of money is generated by golfing and millions of folks earn a darn
good living employed directly and indirectly by the golfing
industry... and golf is especially good for the food industry, many of
the finast restaurants on the planet are located on golf courses, and
they employ many of the finest chefs. How can anyone begrudge him,
Tiger is pretty generous with his money and his time, and no one can
seriously claim he isn't deserving, he's probably about the best
golfer ever.

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 3:28 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 3:09 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>>>>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>>>>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>>>>>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>>>>>> You are .... a sad person.
>>>>>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>>>>>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>>>>>> Umm.. okay.
>>>>>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
>>>>>> agree with...
>>>>>> Congratulations.
>>>>> You must be speaking for yourself....
>>>> And you? Who do you speak for?
>>> I never claimed to speak for anyone but you seemed to when you said:
>>> > You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has
>>> close
>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>> You seem speaking for those that you seem to think don't care.
>> The point you never made?
>>
>> I choose to not be "not nice" to you... but you still have little detail
>> as to why I should.
>>
>> Do you have a point?
>
> Do you? I think not other than to try and impress yourself.

How about we stop here?

I do not have an issue with you, and I do wish you a happy holiday.

Bob

On Nov 27, 3:40*pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 3:28 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>> On Nov 27, 3:09 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
> >>>>>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
> >>>>>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
> >>>>>>>> to a billion dollars?
> >>>>>>>> You are .... a sad person.
> >>>>>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
> >>>>>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
> >>>>>> Umm.. okay.
> >>>>>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
> >>>>>> * agree with...
> >>>>>> Congratulations.
> >>>>> You must be speaking for yourself....
> >>>> And you? Who do you speak for?
> >>> *I never claimed to speak for anyone but you seemed to when you said:
> >>> *> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has
> >>> close
> >>>> to a billion dollars?
> >>> You seem *speaking for those that you seem to think don't care.
> >> The point you never made?
>
> >> I choose to not be "not nice" to you... but you still have little detail
> >> as to why I should.
>
> >> Do you have a point?
>
> > Do you? I think not other than to try and impress yourself.
>
> How about we stop here?
>
> I do not have an issue with you, and I do wish you a happy holiday.
>
> Bob

Ok by me. Happy holiday's to you!!

Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Nov 27, 3:40 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 3:28 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 27, 3:09 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 2:51 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 2:33 pm, Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Chemo the Clown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/11/27/tiger.woods/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>> Well...he might have been eating something.
>>>>>>>>>> You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has close
>>>>>>>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>>>>>>>> You are .... a sad person.
>>>>>>>>> Why the hell did you even waste your time to respond to this thread.
>>>>>>>>> You're pathetic. Wait...I suppose you speak for everyone on the NG?
>>>>>>>> Umm.. okay.
>>>>>>>> You make assumptions that require only others that are as lame as you to
>>>>>>>> agree with...
>>>>>>>> Congratulations.
>>>>>>> You must be speaking for yourself....
>>>>>> And you? Who do you speak for?
>>>>> I never claimed to speak for anyone but you seemed to when you said:
>>>>> > You think that anyone here cares about a 33 yr old golfer that has
>>>>> close
>>>>>> to a billion dollars?
>>>>> You seem speaking for those that you seem to think don't care.
>>>> The point you never made?
>>>> I choose to not be "not nice" to you... but you still have little detail
>>>> as to why I should.
>>>> Do you have a point?
>>> Do you? I think not other than to try and impress yourself.
>> How about we stop here?
>>
>> I do not have an issue with you, and I do wish you a happy holiday.
>>
>> Bob
>
> Ok by me. Happy holiday's to you!!

A sincere wish that your holiday period here is a good one.

I also wish you have several more :-)

And thanks, I know you to be a nice person here. I chose to keep
thinking that.

Bob