Thread: Stew Still Denies his Sock Puppets

On Sep 26, 10:42*pm, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:31:13 -0500, info wrote:
> > Actually Squirts this wasn't me, it's a sock using the same version of
> > agent and posting on eternal september.
>
> You're in denial Stew. *I'm _much_ smarter than you. *Show me one
> other person who has the same posting-host on Motzarella?
>
> n...@spamnot.org:
> posting-host="MzpgA+bR4Ug/Of2AoVMeUQ";
>
> Stew as i...@foodforu.ca:
> posting-host="MzpgA+bR4Ug/Of2AoVMeUQ";
>
> Gee, they match. *Another "coincidence" is that you both post to
> wpg.general and rec.cruises (among others). *Using the same newsreader
> and making the same STUpid, useless posts. *And you both just started
> reading/posting in AFF-F. *
>
> You both talk, walk, and smell like a duck to me. *There's also at
> least one other of you as well.
>
> Now put on your best Richard Nixon impression and say, "I Am Not A
> Sock Puppet!"
>
> > How do we know it wasn't you, I understand you've got a few socks you
> > use regularly.
>
> Because when I post VIA motzarella, it looks like this.
>
> -sw

You must lead a very lonely life to care about Stew

On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT), Chemo the Clown
<[email protected]> wrote:

> You must lead a very lonely life to care about Stew

You're accusing stu of being sw or sw of being stu? Either way, it
has to be better living through chemicals for you. SW has plenty of
socks and none of them are stu. Stu has alternate IDs and none of
them are sw.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:23:29 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT), Chemo the Clown
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You must lead a very lonely life to care about Stew
>
>You're accusing stu of being sw or sw of being stu? Either way, it
>has to be better living through chemicals for you. SW has plenty of
>socks and none of them are stu. Stu has alternate IDs and none of
>them are sw.

I have four in total, [email protected] , [email protected] ,
[email protected] and this one. All have my domain in the addy.

On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:17:27 -0500, Stu <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:23:29 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT), Chemo the Clown
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> You must lead a very lonely life to care about Stew
> >
> >You're accusing stu of being sw or sw of being stu? Either way, it
> >has to be better living through chemicals for you. SW has plenty of
> >socks and none of them are stu. Stu has alternate IDs and none of
> >them are sw.
>
> I have four in total, [email protected] , [email protected] ,
> [email protected] and this one. All have my domain in the addy.

I don't call those sock puppets, stu. They are alternate IDs. It's
easy enough to see the foodforu.ca part of your address and figure out
it's you... if anyone cares enough to notice. You also don't argue
with yourself for the sole purpose of taking up bandwidth and wasting
other people's time.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

Chester lied:

>> You're accusing stu of being sw or sw of being stu? Either way, it
>> has to be better living through chemicals for you. SW has plenty of
>> socks and none of them are stu. Stu has alternate IDs and none of
>> them are sw.
>
> I have four in total, [email protected] , [email protected] ,
> [email protected] and this one. All have my domain in the addy.

You also post as "nfw" and "wrkitout". IIRC I caught you posting as one or
two other socks, but you are definitely those two.

Bob