-
Reducing food intake.
Reducing food intake.
On the Science Channel, A program on starvation did a study on
rats. On set a normal diet and one side a limited starvation
diet. The limited diet rats lived twice as long.
Speculation said humans could live longer lives.
Stating the average human consumes 4,000 calories a day,
reducing intake *could* add 10 to 15 years.
While not exacting science, eating less is healthier than
overeating rich or fatty foods.
When I was reducing, I kept it between 1,500 and 2,000
calories a day. I haven't tracked my caloric intake in years.
Breakfast and orange or lime'd water keep me satisfied all
day, with occasional snacks, yogurt, grapes, etc. Sure some of
my breakfasts aren't weight watchers worthy but I'm still fit
and trim, sometimes verging on skinny.
This post should in no way be construed as dietary advice,
just a few interesting numbers.
Andy
-
Re: Reducing food intake.
Andy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Reducing food intake.
>
> On the Science Channel, A program on starvation did a study on
> rats. On set a normal diet and one side a limited starvation
> diet. The limited diet rats lived twice as long.
>
> Speculation said humans could live longer lives.
>
> Stating the average human consumes 4,000 calories a day,
> reducing intake *could* add 10 to 15 years.
>
> While not exacting science, eating less is healthier than
> overeating rich or fatty foods.
>
> When I was reducing, I kept it between 1,500 and 2,000
> calories a day. I haven't tracked my caloric intake in years.
>
> Breakfast and orange or lime'd water keep me satisfied all
> day, with occasional snacks, yogurt, grapes, etc. Sure some of
> my breakfasts aren't weight watchers worthy but I'm still fit
> and trim, sometimes verging on skinny.
>
> This post should in no way be construed as dietary advice,
> just a few interesting numbers.
>
> Andy
Who was that cardiologist said, be hungry. Dr...
-
Re: Reducing food intake.
gregz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Reducing food intake.
>>
>> On the Science Channel, A program on starvation did a
>> study on rats. On set a normal diet and one side a limited
>> starvation diet. The limited diet rats lived twice as
>> long.
>>
>> Speculation said humans could live longer lives.
>>
>> Stating the average human consumes 4,000 calories a day,
>> reducing intake *could* add 10 to 15 years.
>>
>> While not exacting science, eating less is healthier than
>> overeating rich or fatty foods.
>>
>> When I was reducing, I kept it between 1,500 and 2,000
>> calories a day. I haven't tracked my caloric intake in
>> years.
>>
>> Breakfast and orange or lime'd water keep me satisfied all
>> day, with occasional snacks, yogurt, grapes, etc. Sure
>> some of my breakfasts aren't weight watchers worthy but
>> I'm still fit and trim, sometimes verging on skinny.
>>
>> This post should in no way be construed as dietary advice,
>> just a few interesting numbers.
>>
>> Andy
>
> Who was that cardiologist said, be hungry. Dr...
gregz,
I haven't the faintest idea. Maybe that's how the Cooking
Channel got their "Stay hungry" slogan? It sounds better sense
than "Stay Full."
Best,
Andy
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules