Thread: Re: Wilderness survival techniques and tips

"George Orwell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ...
> "james" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]..
>>
>> Your signature doesn't have a properly formatted separator and you're
>> cross-posting to too many newsgroups.
>
> **** off Follett! You're not in demon.local now, you know!
>
> You have absolutely NO SUPPORT unless your sock puppet
> Blind Richard pops in to lend you a hand.
>
> **** OFF FOLLETT!
>
>
That's not very nice, you'd have more effect giving Jim a big wet kiss

Steve Terry

In message <[email protected]>, George
Orwell <[email protected]> writes
>"james" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]..
>>
>> Your signature doesn't have a properly formatted separator and you're
>> cross-posting to too many newsgroups.
>
>**** off Follett! You're not in demon.local now, you know!

Gosh. I had no idea!
>
>You have absolutely NO SUPPORT

Hallo, Wim. You don't know that and in any event I never look for
support. All you can be certain of are your own opinions otherwise
you're demonstrating such a lack of self-worth that you feel it
necessary to parade your opinions as facts in the hope that others might
fall into line behind you. It's best to depend only on yourself; support
from others may not be forthcoming.

> unless your sock puppet
>Blind Richard pops in to lend you a hand.

I'm surprised you dare take on Richard after the roasting he gave you!
And the roasting I gave you for spouting nonsense about my supposed
association with David Irving.

Still, I admire your chutzpah in blethering about socks when you're up
to your tired old tricks again of hiding your identity and cowering
behind a fake name.

What I want you to do now is make a really big attempt to unearth the
truth rather than your absurd hate-doctored shoot-from-the-hip 'facts'.
One great big fact for you to cope with is that Richard is definitely
not blind. Not now. A different story a few years ago, maybe, but not
today. When you've come to terms with that, see if you can struggle with
the simple fact that Richard has, to my uncertain knowledge, never been
involved with the college at Redhill. The college has been closed for
some years, but the RNIB work continues, particularly the Moon
Programme.

>**** OFF FOLLETT!

That should read: "**** off, Follett." No wonder you never cut the cress
as a writer.

Cheers and good luck.

--
James Follett. Novelist. (G1LXP) http://www.jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk
A wise and all-knowing Providence gave us an abundance of losers to endure
all the suffering and to do most of the work.

On Fri, 1 May 2009 20:35:48 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"james" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
>>
>> Your signature doesn't have a properly formatted separator and you're
>> cross-posting to too many newsgroups.
>
>**** off Follett! You're not in demon.local now, you know!

For some reason, your newsreader didn't post this in the correct
subthread. Learn to drive your own software before criticising James,
eh?
--
Hooray for the differently sane.