Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

  1. #1
    Little Malice Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant


  2. #2
    Nancy Young Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant


    "Blinky the Shark" <[email protected]> wrote

    > Little Malice wrote:
    >
    >> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    >>
    >>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    >>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    >>
    >> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    >> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...

    >
    > That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    > for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
    > OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.


    I was thinking I wish I could download some food from you
    guys once in a while.

    nancy



  3. #3
    zxcvbob Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant


    Blinky the Shark wrote:
    > Little Malice wrote:
    >
    >> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    >>
    >>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    >>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    >> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    >> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...

    >
    > That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    > for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
    > OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.
    >
    >



    Was my reply too subtle? Dammit!

    Bob

  4. #4
    Blinky the Shark Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    Little Malice wrote:

    > One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    >
    >> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    >> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    >
    > Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    > hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...


    That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
    OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.


    --
    Blinky
    Killing all posts from Google Groups
    The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
    Blinky: http://blinkynet.net


  5. #5
    Blinky the Shark Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    zxcvbob wrote:

    >
    > Blinky the Shark wrote:
    >> Little Malice wrote:
    >>
    >>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    >>>
    >>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    >>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
    >>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    >>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...

    >>
    >> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    >> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
    >> OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.

    >
    > Was my reply too subtle? Dammit!


    For me, I guess. I haven't been here long enough to know who gets things
    and who doesn't.


    --
    Blinky
    Killing all posts from Google Groups
    The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
    Blinky: http://blinkynet.net


  6. #6
    Blinky the Shark Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:

    > newsgroups adjusted, followups reset to RFC
    >
    > In article <[email protected] .net>,
    > Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>Little Malice wrote:
    >>
    >>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    >>>
    >>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    >>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
    >>>
    >>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    >>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...

    >>
    >>That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    >>for uploading and downloading *food*.

    >
    > I'm not entirely sure that *some* of those answers that looked serious
    > were totally so . *waves hello*


    As I must mentioned to zxcvbob, because I haven't been hanging around here
    long - only a few months - I don't know everyone well enough to know
    everybody's styles.

    >>Not information. Food. Reread the
    >>OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.

    >
    > Nah, I read it too.
    >
    > Food downloads from some of the leading lights of RFC are the second
    > thing I'd want if that kind of "technology" existed.


    Ohyeah. Sign me up, too.

    > The first thing would be the ability to deliver a dope slap over TCP/IP.
    > (*evil grin*)


    I'd probably stop filtering Google Gropers, then, and...well, you get the
    picture.


    --
    Blinky
    Killing all posts from Google Groups
    The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
    Blinky: http://blinkynet.net


  7. #7
    Aratzio Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:17:00 -0800, in the land of alt.config, Brian
    Mailman <[email protected]> got double secret probation for
    writing:

    >Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
    >> newsgroups adjusted, followups reset to RFC
    >>
    >> In article <[email protected] .net>,
    >> Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>Little Malice wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    >>>>
    >>>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    >>>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
    >>>>
    >>>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    >>>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...\

    >
    >No, news.groups is only for *serious* proposals. The OP wants the
    >clubhouse the ones who call the big shots hang out in.
    >
    >B/


    My cat buried it in the litter box on the 23rd.

    --

    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

    Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

  8. #8
    Janet Baraclough Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    The message <[email protected] .net>
    from Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> contains these words:


    > That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    > for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food.


    I've just uploaded some plankton, let me know how it tasted.

    Janet

  9. #9
    Blinky the Shark Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    Janet Baraclough wrote:

    > The message <[email protected] .net>
    > from Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> contains these words:
    >
    >
    >> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
    >> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food.

    >
    > I've just uploaded some plankton, let me know how it tasted.


    It lacks pretty much everything. Try some some seals next time.
    Mmmmm...seals.


    --
    Blinky
    Killing all posts from Google Groups
    The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
    Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

    430 No such article



    430 No such article


    500 What? ' SConn tmbuf count : 0 n=0 '''
    500 What? ' ID : news-reader14.eqx.unsr.net'

    500 What? ' SConn tmbuf count : 0 n=0 '''
    500 What? ' ID : news-reader14.eqx.unsr.net'





    400 news.astraweb.com: Idle timeout.


  10. #10
    Little Malice Guest

    Default Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

    One time on Usenet, Brian Mailman <[email protected]> said:
    > Little Malice wrote:
    > > One time on Usenet, Brian Mailman <[email protected]> said:
    > >> Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
    > >> > newsgroups adjusted, followups reset to RFC
    > >> >
    > >> > In article <[email protected] .net>,
    > >> > Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> >>Little Malice wrote:
    > >> >>
    > >> >>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
    > >> >>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
    > >> >>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...\
    > >>
    > >> No, news.groups is only for *serious* proposals. The OP wants the
    > >> clubhouse the ones who call the big shots hang out in.

    > >
    > > I was kidding, Brian...

    >
    > Not to worry. It's an alt.config in-joke.


    > Like "spatula!" might be remembered as an rfc in-joke.


    Ah, I see -- I've been away from alt.config for a loooong time... :-)

    --
    Jani in WA

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32