Thread: Re: Proposal: rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant

"Blinky the Shark" <[email protected]> wrote

> Little Malice wrote:
>
>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
>>
>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
>>
>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...
>
> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
> OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.

I was thinking I wish I could download some food from you
guys once in a while.

nancy

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Little Malice wrote:
>
>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
>>
>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...
>
> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
> OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.
>
>


Was my reply too subtle? Dammit!

Bob

Little Malice wrote:

> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
>
>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
>
> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...

That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

zxcvbob wrote:

>
> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Little Malice wrote:
>>
>>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
>>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
>>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
>>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...
>>
>> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
>> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food. Reread the
>> OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.
>
> Was my reply too subtle? Dammit!

For me, I guess. I haven't been here long enough to know who gets things
and who doesn't.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:

> newsgroups adjusted, followups reset to RFC
>
> In article <[email protected] .net>,
> Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Little Malice wrote:
>>
>>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
>>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
>>>
>>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
>>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...
>>
>>That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
>>for uploading and downloading *food*.
>
> I'm not entirely sure that *some* of those answers that looked serious
> were totally so . *waves hello*

As I must mentioned to zxcvbob, because I haven't been hanging around here
long - only a few months - I don't know everyone well enough to know
everybody's styles.

>>Not information. Food. Reread the
>>OP completely -- I think you'll be only the second person to do so.
>
> Nah, I read it too.
>
> Food downloads from some of the leading lights of RFC are the second
> thing I'd want if that kind of "technology" existed.

Ohyeah. Sign me up, too.

> The first thing would be the ability to deliver a dope slap over TCP/IP.
> (*evil grin*)

I'd probably stop filtering Google Gropers, then, and...well, you get the
picture.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:17:00 -0800, in the land of alt.config, Brian
Mailman <[email protected]> got double secret probation for
writing:

>Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
>> newsgroups adjusted, followups reset to RFC
>>
>> In article <[email protected] .net>,
>> Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Little Malice wrote:
>>>
>>>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
>>>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
>>>>
>>>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
>>>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...\
>
>No, news.groups is only for *serious* proposals. The OP wants the
>clubhouse the ones who call the big shots hang out in.
>
>B/

My cat buried it in the litter box on the 23rd.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

The message <[email protected] .net>
from Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> contains these words:


> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food.

I've just uploaded some plankton, let me know how it tasted.

Janet

Janet Baraclough wrote:

> The message <[email protected] .net>
> from Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> contains these words:
>
>
>> That OP got a lot of serious answers for being a post promoting a group
>> for uploading and downloading *food*. Not information. Food.
>
> I've just uploaded some plankton, let me know how it tasted.

It lacks pretty much everything. Try some some seals next time.
Mmmmm...seals.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

430 No such article



430 No such article


500 What? ' SConn tmbuf count : 0 n=0 '''
500 What? ' ID : news-reader14.eqx.unsr.net'

500 What? ' SConn tmbuf count : 0 n=0 '''
500 What? ' ID : news-reader14.eqx.unsr.net'





400 news.astraweb.com: Idle timeout.

One time on Usenet, Brian Mailman <[email protected]> said:
> Little Malice wrote:
> > One time on Usenet, Brian Mailman <[email protected]> said:
> >> Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
> >> > newsgroups adjusted, followups reset to RFC
> >> >
> >> > In article <[email protected] .net>,
> >> > Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>Little Malice wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> One time on Usenet, [email protected] said:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> I'd like to propose a new newsgroup called
> >> >>>> rec.food.cooking.online.restaurant
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Then post this to news.groups, not alt.config. They have no
> >> >>> hand in creating Big 8 groups. Sheesh...\
> >>
> >> No, news.groups is only for *serious* proposals. The OP wants the
> >> clubhouse the ones who call the big shots hang out in.
> >
> > I was kidding, Brian...
>
> Not to worry. It's an alt.config in-joke.

> Like "spatula!" might be remembered as an rfc in-joke.

Ah, I see -- I've been away from alt.config for a loooong time... :-)

--
Jani in WA