Thread: Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
>> all!
>>
>Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
>servers are out again.

Mine wasn't blank, but it is a totally different website. Not related
to rfc at all.

Christine
--
http://nightstirrings.blogspot.com

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
>> all!
>>
>Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
>servers are out again.

Oh, new graphics: http://i54.tinypic.com/2z4bip1.jpg

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:30:59 -0700, Christine Dabney
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
> >> all!
> >>
> >Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
> >servers are out again.
>
> Mine wasn't blank, but it is a totally different website. Not related
> to rfc at all.
>
I guess you're seeing what sky is seeing. I see nothing but white,
not even a sidebar like nb seems to see.


--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:35:32 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
> >> all!
> >>
> >Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
> >servers are out again.
>
> Oh, new graphics:

Are you drunk? It's the middle of the day.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On 6/14/2011 4:02 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
>> all!
>>
> Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
> servers are out again.
>

Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org <--- works
just fine. Sorry 'bout that!

Sky

--

Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!!

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:07:44 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
> how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org <--- works
> just fine. Sorry 'bout that!

That happened on mine too! I guess it was a FF update that did it
because we haven't "talked" in a while and I know my bookmark was
right. Glad you brought our attention to it, thanks. Will change it
back to .org now.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Jun 14, 2:35*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <skyho...@NOsbcglobal.SnPeAtM>
> >wrote:
>
> >> Has something happened to the RFC website? *It does not look familiar at
> >> all!
>
> >Are you getting anything, sky? *My screen was blank. *Maybe her
> >servers are out again.
>
> Oh, new graphics:http://i54.tinypic.com/2z4bip1.jpg

Man...I'm hungry!!

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:22:40 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:


>That happened on mine too! I guess it was a FF update that did it
>because we haven't "talked" in a while and I know my bookmark was
>right. Glad you brought our attention to it, thanks. Will change it
>back to .org now.

No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
bookmarked.

Christine
--
http://nightstirrings.blogspot.com

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:26:59 -0700, Christine Dabney
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:22:40 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> >That happened on mine too! I guess it was a FF update that did it
> >because we haven't "talked" in a while and I know my bookmark was
> >right. Glad you brought our attention to it, thanks. Will change it
> >back to .org now.
>
> No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
> bookmarked.
>
Okay, now I'm totally confused. Maybe Cathy will explain.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On 14/06/2011 5:30 PM, Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
>>> all!
>>>
>> Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
>> servers are out again.
>
> Mine wasn't blank, but it is a totally different website. Not related
> to rfc at all.
>
> Christine


I just tried it and got a completely different site. To make matters
worse, a pop up with a screensaver opened up, and I thought my controls
were supposed to prevent that, so that makes me suspicious.

On 2011-06-14, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:26:59 -0700, Christine Dabney

>> No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
>> bookmarked.
>>
> Okay, now I'm totally confused. Maybe Cathy will explain.

I've never had it bookmarked as .com. Always .org as far back as I
can remember. Dot com is for commercial, which recfoodcooking has
never been. I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.

nb

On 14/06/2011 8:35 PM, notbob wrote:

>
> I've never had it bookmarked as .com. Always .org as far back as I
> can remember. Dot com is for commercial, which recfoodcooking has
> never been. I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
> many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.

I can't tell you if I bookmarked it as .com or .org. I originally had
the site online and bookmarked it whatever it was. It was only today
that the new sire site showed up.

On 15 Jun 2011 00:35:46 GMT, notbob <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
> many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.

Actually *my* question was about why I had .com book marked and now
it's .org.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

In article <[email protected]>,
Sky <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 6/14/2011 4:02 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
> >> all!
> >>
> > Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
> > servers are out again.
> >
>
> Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
> how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org <--- works
> just fine. Sorry 'bout that!
>
> Sky

What is FF?

--
Barb,
Creamed Cornbread, June 13, 2011; http://web.me.com/barbschaller

On 2011-06-15, Melba's Jammin' <[email protected]> wrote:

> What is FF?

Firefox. It's a free 3rd party browser:

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/new/

nb

On 15/06/2011 12:05 PM, Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article<[email protected]>,
> Sky<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 6/14/2011 4:02 PM, sf wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
>>>> all!
>>>>
>>> Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
>>> servers are out again.
>>>
>>
>> Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
>> how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org<--- works
>> just fine. Sorry 'bout that!
>>
>> Sky
>
> What is FF?
>
FF = FireFox, the decent browser alternative to that Micro$oft product.

Krypsis

"sf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> On 15 Jun 2011 00:35:46 GMT, notbob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
>> many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.
>
> Actually *my* question was about why I had .com book marked and now
> it's .org.
>
> --
>
> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.


IIRC, both the .org and .com sites were true rfc sites, apparently now they
have let the .com one go. Just hope nobody completely incompatible with
what this group is, picks it up and does something we wouldn't really like
with it.

Boli

Christine Dabney <[email protected]> wrote:

> No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
> bookmarked.

It was .org from the get-go, i.e. ever since John Robinson (Levelwave)
registered the domain in 2003, taking over the rfc part of Damsel's
Edible Complex site.

John paid for the registration out of his own pocket; the renewal fee
was paid by a few rfc donors, IIRC.

The .com part was added by Cathy when she took over the .org domain.
The registration for both the .org and the .com domains has been paid by
Cathy out of her own pocket ever since.

Victor

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:56:38 -0400, "bolivar" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> IIRC, both the .org and .com sites were true rfc sites, apparently now they
> have let the .com one go.

I'm not asking you to second guess, just wondering out loud... I
wonder why they would keep org and not com? Com is automatic with me,
and I have to think about org. Usually nonprofits have that
extension. Is it less expensive to rent?

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.