Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

  1. #1
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    > all!
    >

    Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    servers are out again.

    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

  2. #2
    Christine Dabney Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
    >wrote:
    >
    >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    >> all!
    >>

    >Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    >servers are out again.


    Mine wasn't blank, but it is a totally different website. Not related
    to rfc at all.

    Christine
    --
    http://nightstirrings.blogspot.com

  3. #3
    Brooklyn1 Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
    >wrote:
    >
    >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    >> all!
    >>

    >Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    >servers are out again.


    Oh, new graphics: http://i54.tinypic.com/2z4bip1.jpg

  4. #4
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:30:59 -0700, Christine Dabney
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
    > >wrote:
    > >
    > >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    > >> all!
    > >>

    > >Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    > >servers are out again.

    >
    > Mine wasn't blank, but it is a totally different website. Not related
    > to rfc at all.
    >

    I guess you're seeing what sky is seeing. I see nothing but white,
    not even a sidebar like nb seems to see.


    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

  5. #5
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:35:32 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:

    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
    > >wrote:
    > >
    > >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    > >> all!
    > >>

    > >Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    > >servers are out again.

    >
    > Oh, new graphics:


    Are you drunk? It's the middle of the day.

    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

  6. #6
    Sky Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 6/14/2011 4:02 PM, sf wrote:
    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    >> all!
    >>

    > Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    > servers are out again.
    >


    Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
    how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org <--- works
    just fine. Sorry 'bout that!

    Sky

    --

    Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
    Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!!

  7. #7
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:07:44 -0500, Sky <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
    > how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org <--- works
    > just fine. Sorry 'bout that!


    That happened on mine too! I guess it was a FF update that did it
    because we haven't "talked" in a while and I know my bookmark was
    right. Glad you brought our attention to it, thanks. Will change it
    back to .org now.

    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

  8. #8
    Chemo the Clown Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Jun 14, 2:35*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    > >On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky <skyho...@NOsbcglobal.SnPeAtM>
    > >wrote:

    >
    > >> Has something happened to the RFC website? *It does not look familiar at
    > >> all!

    >
    > >Are you getting anything, sky? *My screen was blank. *Maybe her
    > >servers are out again.

    >
    > Oh, new graphics:http://i54.tinypic.com/2z4bip1.jpg


    Man...I'm hungry!!

  9. #9
    Christine Dabney Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:22:40 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:


    >That happened on mine too! I guess it was a FF update that did it
    >because we haven't "talked" in a while and I know my bookmark was
    >right. Glad you brought our attention to it, thanks. Will change it
    >back to .org now.


    No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
    bookmarked.

    Christine
    --
    http://nightstirrings.blogspot.com

  10. #10
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:26:59 -0700, Christine Dabney
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:22:40 -0700, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    > >That happened on mine too! I guess it was a FF update that did it
    > >because we haven't "talked" in a while and I know my bookmark was
    > >right. Glad you brought our attention to it, thanks. Will change it
    > >back to .org now.

    >
    > No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
    > bookmarked.
    >

    Okay, now I'm totally confused. Maybe Cathy will explain.

    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

  11. #11
    Dave Smith Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 14/06/2011 5:30 PM, Christine Dabney wrote:
    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:02:58 -0700, sf<[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    >>> all!
    >>>

    >> Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    >> servers are out again.

    >
    > Mine wasn't blank, but it is a totally different website. Not related
    > to rfc at all.
    >
    > Christine



    I just tried it and got a completely different site. To make matters
    worse, a pop up with a screensaver opened up, and I thought my controls
    were supposed to prevent that, so that makes me suspicious.


  12. #12
    notbob Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 2011-06-14, sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:26:59 -0700, Christine Dabney


    >> No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
    >> bookmarked.
    >>

    > Okay, now I'm totally confused. Maybe Cathy will explain.


    I've never had it bookmarked as .com. Always .org as far back as I
    can remember. Dot com is for commercial, which recfoodcooking has
    never been. I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
    many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.

    nb

  13. #13
    Dave Smith Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 14/06/2011 8:35 PM, notbob wrote:

    >
    > I've never had it bookmarked as .com. Always .org as far back as I
    > can remember. Dot com is for commercial, which recfoodcooking has
    > never been. I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
    > many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.


    I can't tell you if I bookmarked it as .com or .org. I originally had
    the site online and bookmarked it whatever it was. It was only today
    that the new sire site showed up.

  14. #14
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 15 Jun 2011 00:35:46 GMT, notbob <[email protected]> wrote:

    > I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
    > many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.


    Actually *my* question was about why I had .com book marked and now
    it's .org.

    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

  15. #15
    Melba's Jammin' Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Sky <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On 6/14/2011 4:02 PM, sf wrote:
    > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > >> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    > >> all!
    > >>

    > > Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    > > servers are out again.
    > >

    >
    > Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
    > how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org <--- works
    > just fine. Sorry 'bout that!
    >
    > Sky


    What is FF?

    --
    Barb,
    Creamed Cornbread, June 13, 2011; http://web.me.com/barbschaller

  16. #16
    notbob Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 2011-06-15, Melba's Jammin' <[email protected]> wrote:

    > What is FF?


    Firefox. It's a free 3rd party browser:

    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/new/

    nb

  17. #17
    Krypsis Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On 15/06/2011 12:05 PM, Melba's Jammin' wrote:
    > In article<[email protected]>,
    > Sky<[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On 6/14/2011 4:02 PM, sf wrote:
    >>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:23:14 -0500, Sky<[email protected]>
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Has something happened to the RFC website? It does not look familiar at
    >>>> all!
    >>>>
    >>> Are you getting anything, sky? My screen was blank. Maybe her
    >>> servers are out again.
    >>>

    >>
    >> Somehow, the RFC shortcut on FF got changed to '.com'! I haven't a clue
    >> how that happened. RFC ---> http://www.recfoodcooking.org<--- works
    >> just fine. Sorry 'bout that!
    >>
    >> Sky

    >
    > What is FF?
    >

    FF = FireFox, the decent browser alternative to that Micro$oft product.

    Krypsis



  18. #18
    bolivar Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy


    "sf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > On 15 Jun 2011 00:35:46 GMT, notbob <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> I think the question should be, how did it happen that so
    >> many queries get correctly redirected FROM recfoodcooking.com.

    >
    > Actually *my* question was about why I had .com book marked and now
    > it's .org.
    >
    > --
    >
    > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.



    IIRC, both the .org and .com sites were true rfc sites, apparently now they
    have let the .com one go. Just hope nobody completely incompatible with
    what this group is, picks it up and does something we wouldn't really like
    with it.

    Boli



  19. #19
    Victor Sack Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    Christine Dabney <[email protected]> wrote:

    > No, it used to be .com..all this time. That was how it was
    > bookmarked.


    It was .org from the get-go, i.e. ever since John Robinson (Levelwave)
    registered the domain in 2003, taking over the rfc part of Damsel's
    Edible Complex site.

    John paid for the registration out of his own pocket; the renewal fee
    was paid by a few rfc donors, IIRC.

    The .com part was added by Cathy when she took over the .org domain.
    The registration for both the .org and the .com domains has been paid by
    Cathy out of her own pocket ever since.

    Victor

  20. #20
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Ping: ChattyCathy

    On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:56:38 -0400, "bolivar" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >
    > IIRC, both the .org and .com sites were true rfc sites, apparently now they
    > have let the .com one go.


    I'm not asking you to second guess, just wondering out loud... I
    wonder why they would keep org and not com? Com is automatic with me,
    and I have to think about org. Usually nonprofits have that
    extension. Is it less expensive to rent?

    --

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32