Thread: OT vs. OT?

Andy wrote:

> OT... On topic?

That would be "not OT".

-S-

On 19-Sep-2012, Andy <[email protected]> wrote:

> OT vs. OT?
>
> Why in the world didn't anyone protest OT?
>
> OT... Off topic?
> OT... On topic?
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen... I present Usenet stupidity.
>
> HA!!!
>
>
> Andy

it should be oT for on topic -------------- why? because there is too
little of it 8-(
--

Change Cujo to Juno in email address.

"Steve Freides" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andy wrote:
>
>> OT... On topic?
>
> That would be "not OT".
>
> -S-



Steve,

It's a double entrendre.

C'mon you know better!

Best,

Andy

hey, I stated that a few months back... it's there in the Googlesphere.

btw, if it had gone to OT Manning would have took them to the bone zone and
won it.... Stupid defense letting the dirty birds getting a first down.
They did make two stops before that to make it interesting though...
replacement refs suck. I only watched the last half and saw two blown
calls.