Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: OT vs. OT?

  1. #1
    Andy Guest

    Default OT vs. OT?

    OT vs. OT?

    Why in the world didn't anyone protest OT?

    OT... Off topic?
    OT... On topic?

    Ladies and Gentlemen... I present Usenet stupidity.

    HA!!!


    Andy

  2. #2
    Steve Freides Guest

    Default Re: OT vs. OT?

    Andy wrote:

    > OT... On topic?


    That would be "not OT".

    -S-



  3. #3
    l, not -l Guest

    Default Re: OT vs. OT?


    On 19-Sep-2012, Andy <[email protected]> wrote:

    > OT vs. OT?
    >
    > Why in the world didn't anyone protest OT?
    >
    > OT... Off topic?
    > OT... On topic?
    >
    > Ladies and Gentlemen... I present Usenet stupidity.
    >
    > HA!!!
    >
    >
    > Andy


    it should be oT for on topic -------------- why? because there is too
    little of it 8-(
    --

    Change Cujo to Juno in email address.

  4. #4
    Andy Guest

    Default Re: OT vs. OT?

    "Steve Freides" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Andy wrote:
    >
    >> OT... On topic?

    >
    > That would be "not OT".
    >
    > -S-




    Steve,

    It's a double entrendre.

    C'mon you know better!

    Best,

    Andy

  5. #5
    Somebody Guest

    Default Re: OT vs. OT?


    hey, I stated that a few months back... it's there in the Googlesphere.

    btw, if it had gone to OT Manning would have took them to the bone zone and
    won it.... Stupid defense letting the dirty birds getting a first down.
    They did make two stops before that to make it interesting though...
    replacement refs suck. I only watched the last half and saw two blown
    calls.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32