Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

  1. #1
    Kathleen Guest

    Default OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:

    Dear Guys,

    I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with
    increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend
    disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically,
    of the "girl on girl" make-out scene.

    First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are
    or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the
    effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a
    woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a
    sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by
    monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing.

    Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual
    advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious",
    just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to
    make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my
    border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me).
    I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum
    ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else",
    to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate
    female's nose out through the back of her skull>.

    Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a
    cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm,
    to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous
    circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE
    I'VE NEVER SEEN IT!

    Turn about is fair play, gentlemen.

    On behalf of your straight female fan base,

    Kathleen



  2. #2
    Tom Biasi Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...


    "Kathleen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:lhTZl.5521$[email protected]..
    > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:
    >
    > Dear Guys,
    >
    > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with
    > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend
    > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically,
    > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene.
    >
    > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are
    > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the
    > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a
    > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a
    > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by
    > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing.
    >
    > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual
    > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious",
    > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to
    > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my
    > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me).
    > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum
    > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else",
    > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate
    > female's nose out through the back of her skull>.
    >
    > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a
    > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm,
    > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous
    > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE
    > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT!
    >
    > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen.
    >
    > On behalf of your straight female fan base,
    >
    > Kathleen
    >
    >
    >



    Kathleen,

    Go cook something.

    Tom



  3. #3
    Nancy2 Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    On Jun 16, 3:30 pm, Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:


    Did this group change to alt.i.hate.horror.flicks?

    N.

  4. #4
    Sqwertz Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Kathleen wrote:
    > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:
    >
    > Dear Guys,
    >
    > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with
    > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend
    > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically,
    > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene.
    >
    > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are
    > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the
    > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a
    > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a
    > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by
    > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing.
    >
    > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual
    > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious",
    > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to
    > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my
    > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me).
    > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum
    > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else",
    > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate
    > female's nose out through the back of her skull>.


    I see a lot of openly gay/bi chicks down on 6th street in Austin on party
    night (any Friday or Saturday). And most of them are are really hot.
    They go around grabbing each others tits and snatches and planting wet
    ones on each other.

    They get a few drinks in them, they seem to go for either sex. OTOH, the
    guys stick to just a few bars and I never have to see their antics,
    thankfully.

    I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than
    for a guy to do another guy. Lesbianism is natural, but man on man is
    just plain demented.

    -sw

  5. #5
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bobo_Bonobo=AE?= Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    On Jun 16, 3:30*pm, Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:


    Why would you want to watch B horror movies anyway?
    >
    > Dear Guys,
    >
    > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    > 911.


    What I wonder is why it always takes them until halfway through the
    movie to figure out that you have to go for the zombie's head. In
    Night of the Living Dead I understand, but what is hard to buy into is
    in subsequent movies I'm supposed to believe that there's a WHOLE town
    where NO ONE has ever seen Night of the Living Dead. I'm sorry,
    that's just not plausible.

    > But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with
    > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend
    > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically,
    > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene.
    >

    If you like nice hetero kissing with nice looking guys and gals, this
    episode of Roswell is chock full:
    http://www.hulu.com/watch/4563/roswell-sexual-healing
    The Max-Liz stuff is just beautiful.
    >
    > Kathleen


    --Bryan

  6. #6
    Kathleen Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

    > On Jun 16, 3:30 pm, Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    >
    >>To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:

    >
    >
    > Why would you want to watch B horror movies anyway?
    >
    >>Dear Guys,
    >>
    >>I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    >>to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    >>911.

    >
    >
    > What I wonder is why it always takes them until halfway through the
    > movie to figure out that you have to go for the zombie's head. In
    > Night of the Living Dead I understand, but what is hard to buy into is
    > in subsequent movies I'm supposed to believe that there's a WHOLE town
    > where NO ONE has ever seen Night of the Living Dead. I'm sorry,
    > that's just not plausible.


    Well yeah. Like I'd assume the zombie/vampire/psycho freak I just bitch
    slapped was dead and just TURN MY BACK. Oh hell no. We're talking
    chainsaws and/or high explosives, followed up with napalm, then me
    kicking the resulting ashes to the four winds.

    Call me a "belt and suspenders" kinda gal.

    OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day


  7. #7
    Omelet Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    In article <lhTZl.5521$[email protected]>,
    Kathleen <[email protected]> wrote:

    > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:
    >
    > Dear Guys,
    >
    > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with
    > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend
    > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically,
    > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene.
    >
    > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are
    > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the
    > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a
    > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a
    > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by
    > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing.
    >
    > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual
    > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious",
    > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to
    > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my
    > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me).


    <chuckles>

    > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum
    > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else",
    > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate
    > female's nose out through the back of her skull>.


    Happily.

    >
    > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a
    > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm,
    > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous
    > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE
    > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT!
    >
    > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen.


    That might be interesting!

    >
    > On behalf of your straight female fan base,
    >
    > Kathleen


    <lol> Well written! :-)
    And oh so true...
    --
    Peace! Om

    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
    It's about learning to dance in the rain.
    -- Anon.

    [email protected]
    Subscribe: [email protected]

  8. #8
    Omelet Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    In article <h19087$slf$[email protected]>,
    Sqwertz <[email protected]> wrote:

    > I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than
    > for a guy to do another guy. Lesbianism is natural, but man on man is
    > just plain demented.
    >
    > -sw


    I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you
    did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant.
    --
    Peace! Om

    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
    It's about learning to dance in the rain.
    -- Anon.

    [email protected]
    Subscribe: [email protected]

  9. #9
    Omelet Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    In article <vyUZl.49910$[email protected]>,
    Kathleen <[email protected]> wrote:

    > OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day


    Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I
    have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday.
    --
    Peace! Om

    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass.
    It's about learning to dance in the rain.
    -- Anon.

    [email protected]
    Subscribe: [email protected]

  10. #10
    Bryan Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    On Jun 16, 6:20*pm, Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > In article <vyUZl.49910$jT6.40...@newsfe17.iad>,
    >
    > *Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    > > OB food: *Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day

    >
    > Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I
    > have in the freezer. *It'll also be his birthday.


    The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird.
    > --
    > Peace! Om
    >

    --Bryan

  11. #11
    dsi1 Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Bryan wrote:
    > On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> In article <vyUZl.49910$jT6.40...@newsfe17.iad>,
    >>
    >> Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    >>> OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day

    >> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I
    >> have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday.

    >
    > The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird.


    I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm
    surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric
    practice.

    OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on
    it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-)

    >> --
    >> Peace! Om
    >>

    > --Bryan


  12. #12
    Bryan Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    On Jun 16, 6:43*pm, dsi1 <d...@spamworld.com> wrote:
    > Bryan wrote:
    > > On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >> In article <vyUZl.49910$jT6.40...@newsfe17.iad>,

    >
    > >> *Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    > >>> OB food: *Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day
    > >> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duckI
    > >> have in the freezer. *It'll also be his birthday.

    >
    > > The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? *Texas is weird.

    >
    > I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm
    > surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric
    > practice.


    What's this "Jew" thing. Om isn't Jewish.
    >
    > OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on
    > it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-)
    >
    >
    >
    > >> --
    > >> Peace! Om

    >
    > > --Bryan


    --Bryan

  13. #13
    dsi1 Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Bryan wrote:
    > On Jun 16, 6:43 pm, dsi1 <d...@spamworld.com> wrote:
    >> Bryan wrote:
    >>> On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>> In article <vyUZl.49910$jT6.40...@newsfe17.iad>,
    >>>> Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    >>>>> OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day
    >>>> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I
    >>>> have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday.
    >>> The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird.

    >> I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm
    >> surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric
    >> practice.

    >
    > What's this "Jew" thing. Om isn't Jewish.


    You misunderstand. I wasn't talking about Om, although she could be
    Jewish. How would I know? I do know that there are Jews in Texas - well
    at least one. I'm talking about the practice of eating animals on their
    birthday - it stinks. Why do you think the Texas ducks includes DOB? So
    you don't roast them on the wrong date - duh!

    >> OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on
    >> it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-)
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>> --
    >>>> Peace! Om
    >>> --Bryan

    >
    > --Bryan


  14. #14
    Bryan Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    On Jun 16, 7:28*pm, dsi1 <d...@spamworld.com> wrote:
    > Bryan wrote:
    > > On Jun 16, 6:43 pm, dsi1 <d...@spamworld.com> wrote:
    > >> Bryan wrote:
    > >>> On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >>>> In article <vyUZl.49910$jT6.40...@newsfe17.iad>,
    > >>>> *Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    > >>>>> OB food: *Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day
    > >>>> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I
    > >>>> have in the freezer. *It'll also be his birthday.
    > >>> The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? *Texas is weird.
    > >> I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm
    > >> surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric
    > >> practice.

    >
    > > What's this "Jew" thing. *Om isn't Jewish.

    >
    > You misunderstand. I wasn't talking about Om, although she could be
    > Jewish. How would I know? I do know that there are Jews in Texas - well
    > at least one. I'm talking about the practice of eating animals on their
    > birthday - it stinks. Why do you think the Texas ducks includes DOB? So
    > you don't roast them on the wrong date - duh!
    >

    I'm pretty up to speed on Old Testament dietary laws, and there's
    nothing in there about not roasting a waterfowl on its birthday.

    Deuteronomy 14:21 does say:
    Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it
    unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou
    mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the
    LORD thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk.
    >
    > >> OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on
    > >> it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-)

    >
    > >>>> --
    > >>>> Peace! Om
    > >>> --Bryan

    >
    > > --Bryan


    --Bryan

  15. #15
    dsi1 Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Bryan wrote:

    > I'm pretty up to speed on Old Testament dietary laws, and there's
    > nothing in there about not roasting a waterfowl on its birthday.
    >
    > Deuteronomy 14:21 does say:
    > Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it
    > unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou
    > mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the
    > LORD thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk.


    Thanks for citing this. I won't comment on God's OK to sell tainted meat
    to strangers at the gate. :-) The idea of an animal being cooked in it's
    mother's milk so horrified the Jews that they separate the pans used for
    cooking meat from any that may touch milk. This is good policy, I think.
    My point is that they have no restrictions on cooking an animal on it's
    birthday - that stinks. For us humans, a birthday means we get free
    cake. For ducks, it means you could get roasted or made into peeking duck.

  16. #16
    Bryan Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    On Jun 16, 8:01*pm, dsi1 <d...@spamworld.com> wrote:
    > Bryan wrote:
    > > I'm pretty up to speed on Old Testament dietary laws, and there's
    > > nothing in there about not roasting a waterfowl on its birthday.

    >
    > > Deuteronomy 14:21 does say:
    > > Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it
    > > unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou
    > > mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the
    > > LORD thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk.

    >
    > Thanks for citing this. I won't comment on God's OK to sell tainted meat
    > to strangers at the gate. :-) The idea of an animal being cooked in it's
    > mother's milk so horrified the Jews that they separate the pans used for
    > cooking meat from any that may touch milk. This is good policy, I think.
    > My point is that they have no restrictions on cooking an animal on it's
    > birthday - that stinks. For us humans, a birthday means we get free
    > cake. For ducks, it means you could get roasted or made into peeking duck..


    I'm not a fan of goat meat, but if it were calf or lamb, thusly
    prepared, it might be pretty good. If it wasn't appealing, why would
    they have to forbid it? I mean, you don't see verses like, "Thou
    shalt not hit thy thumb with a hammer."

    --Bryan

  17. #17
    Bob Muncie Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Omelet wrote:
    > In article <h19087$slf$1@[email protected]>,
    > Sqwertz <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than
    >> for a guy to do another guy. Lesbianism is natural, but man on man is
    >> just plain demented.
    >>
    >> -sw

    >
    > I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you
    > did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant.


    Om - I think he was trolling :-)

  18. #18
    Bob Muncie Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Bryan wrote:
    > On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> In article <vyUZl.49910$jT6.40...@newsfe17.iad>,
    >>
    >> Kathleen <khhfmdeletet...@charter.net> wrote:
    >>> OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day

    >> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I
    >> have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday.

    >
    > The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird.
    >> --
    >> Peace! Om
    >>

    > --Bryan


    Maybe it's been a year since she put daffy in the freezer :-)

  19. #19
    dsi1 Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...

    Bryan wrote:

    > I'm not a fan of goat meat, but if it were calf or lamb, thusly
    > prepared, it might be pretty good. If it wasn't appealing, why would
    > they have to forbid it? I mean, you don't see verses like, "Thou
    > shalt not hit thy thumb with a hammer."
    >


    I have it on good authority from a Texas friend (don't know if he's a
    Jew) that barbecued goat is tasty. Besides the fact that stewing an
    animal in it's mother's milk is an affront to God, I'd take barbecue
    over most anything boiled in milk any day of the week - except maybe
    Wednesday.

    > --Bryan


  20. #20
    Paul M. Cook Guest

    Default Re: OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...


    "Kathleen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:lhTZl.5521$[email protected]..
    > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:
    >
    > Dear Guys,
    >
    > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness
    > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial
    > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with
    > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend
    > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically,
    > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene.
    >
    > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are
    > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the
    > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a
    > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a
    > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by
    > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing.
    >
    > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual
    > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious",
    > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to
    > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my
    > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me).
    > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum
    > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else",
    > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate
    > female's nose out through the back of her skull>.
    >
    > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a
    > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm,
    > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous
    > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE
    > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT!
    >
    > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen.



    Indeed it is. However a recent study I read found that women's sexuality is
    more fluid than a male's. Women who identify as heterosexual when exposed
    to female erotica would sometimes show sexual reactions in the form of
    arousal. Men in the same study were not at all so inclined and in fact
    quite the opposite. That was a study I read on MSN.

    So be that as it may, I know if I was female and being chased by horrible
    and malevolent spirits that in between bouts of paralyzing and blood
    curdling useless screams, that a few minutes of spit swapping or even full
    on sex with another woman would be just the ticket to ease the stress. But
    that's just me. I just need a place and a haunted house is as good as any.
    An opportunity delayed is lost.

    My complaint is they do it early on so you stay tuned to the TV waiting for
    more.



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32