Thread: No shaking today - just burning.

Dimitri wrote:
> http://www.ksby.com/
>
> http://www.keyt.com/
>
> http://www.kcoy.com/
>
> Season # 2 is here and it ain't even summer.
>
> Crap!
>
> Dimitri

do you remeber back about 15 years ago when the city of santa barbara
held an election to revamp its water supply & to get more water
available? the measure was voted down, 'cuz the folks didn't want any
more development than the water supply could support.

harriet & critters in azusa...where the temp is hovering in the 90F's

mequeenbe.nospam <[email protected]> wrote:

>do you remeber back about 15 years ago when the city of santa barbara
>held an election to revamp its water supply & to get more water
>available? the measure was voted down, 'cuz the folks didn't want any
>more development than the water supply could support.

Limiting water development is sometimes the only way available
to the voters of controlling growth in California.

Steve

Steve Pope wrote:
>
> mequeenbe.nospam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >do you remeber back about 15 years ago when the city of santa barbara
> >held an election to revamp its water supply & to get more water
> >available? the measure was voted down, 'cuz the folks didn't want any
> >more development than the water supply could support.
>
> Limiting water development is sometimes the only way available
> to the voters of controlling growth in California.
>
> Steve

Doesn't work around here. There is a limited water supply but the city
allows essentially unrestrained growth.