Thread: Monica Pignotti: Liar and Hypocrite

On Dec 3, 11:07*am, didacticderivative <didacticderivat...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2:44*pm, Monica Pignotti <pigno...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > Announcing just in time for the holidays: The Reverend Dennis Doll
> > with chain attached.
>
> [SNIP]
>
> Please explain. Someone says you invented a "Pigno-o-Meter" and it is
> defamatory, so much so that you demand removals of the "announcement"
> from various blogs.
>
> Yet, you say, probably satirically, that this doll exists.
>
> What's the difference. NONE.
>
> You lie about this doll. Maybe this "lie" could be dismissed in the
> spirit of satire.
>
> However, given your previous actions, this cannot be called anything
> but hypocrisy.
>
> FSU is well rid of your teaching. They would be prudent to take steps
> to ensure that you never return to the classroom.
>
> Eventually, Bruce Thyer will see that you are a complete fraud and
> find another co-author.

I didn't say it exists -- I said it was as real as the Reverend Dennis
Doll, which is an obvious satire and does not exist. Thanks for
showing us all you have no sense of humor.

And no, your repeated attempts to get me in trouble at FSU have failed
miserably.

On Dec 3, 11:07*am, didacticderivative <didacticderivat...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2:44*pm, Monica Pignotti <pigno...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > Announcing just in time for the holidays: The Reverend Dennis Doll
> > with chain attached.
>
> [SNIP]
>
> Please explain. Someone says you invented a "Pigno-o-Meter" and it is
> defamatory, so much so that you demand removals of the "announcement"
> from various blogs.
>
> Yet, you say, probably satirically, that this doll exists.
>
> What's the difference. NONE.
>
The difference is I have not used the individual's full real name in
this satire. You used my real name and it comes up on Google searches
on my name. That's a very big difference and that's what protects
satire. If you use the person's real name, then it is defamatory. I
made up names. That is how real satire is done.

Results 1 - 6 for Monica Pignotti: Liar and Hypocrite Jesus christ.
(0.
15 seconds)

Stripping the Gurus.
..
..
1976) • Monica Pignotti (1989), My Nine Lives in Scientology • Bent
Corydon and .
..
..
..
“How do I know I'm not the reincarnation of Jesus Christ? .
..
..
..
..
..
STRIPPING THE GURUS “You're a hypocrite, a liar, and a prostitute,”
Andrew .
..
..
..
..
..
of the former “Little Flower,” see Monica Furlong's [1987] Thérèseof
Lisieux.

You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?

Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.

"XODDI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ...
> You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?
>
> Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.

whatever this has to do with rec.food.cooking is beyond me. Maybe their
little scientology spaceship with ol' L.Ron will come pick them up soon and
we'll hear the last of this crapola.

So, don't go away mad. JUST GO AWAY.

"Virginia Tadrzynski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:4b1926ea$0$7328$[email protected]..
>
> "XODDI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ...
>> You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?
>>
>> Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.
>
> whatever this has to do with rec.food.cooking is beyond me. Maybe their
> little scientology spaceship with ol' L.Ron will come pick them up soon
> and we'll hear the last of this crapola.
>
> So, don't go away mad. JUST GO AWAY.

I don't know why this was crossposted to your lovely group but I'm going to
post something just to clue you in as you obviously need it.

Alt.religion.scientology is a CRITICAL (of Scientology) forum. And if you'd
have done your homework, you'd have known that.

C

"XODDI" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ...
> You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?
>
> Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.

Oh, yeah, *that* makes sense. No matter what the stance is, everyone's a
neurotic cowardly retard. Riiiiight.

C

On Dec 4, 9:05*pm, "Voltaire's Child" <Voltaires_Ch...@ymail.com>
wrote:
> "XODDI" <root...@loa.com> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] ...
>
> > You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?
>
> > Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.
>
> Oh, yeah, *that* makes sense. No matter what the stance is, everyone's a
> neurotic cowardly retard. Riiiiight.

My little newsgroup gets ****loads of xposts from a.r.s. weekly.

So far my supposition has proven to be right. Your xpost included.

All of you, scienofag and anti-scienofag, are nasty little ****s and
have nothing of value to communicate to your betters.

"Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Dec 4, 9:05 pm, "Voltaire's Child" <Voltaires_Ch...@ymail.com>
wrote:
> "XODDI" <root...@loa.com> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] ...
>
> > You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?
>
> > Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.
>
> Oh, yeah, *that* makes sense. No matter what the stance is, everyone's a
> neurotic cowardly retard. Riiiiight.

>My little newsgroup gets ****loads of xposts from a.r.s. weekly.

Sux2bu.

>So far my supposition has proven to be right. Your xpost included.

>All of you, scienofag and anti-scienofag, are nasty little ****s and
>have nothing of value to communicate to your betters.

I'll let you know if I actually *find* anyone who's my "better"(s) on the
internet. I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be someone who makes blanket
statements about people he/she/it does not know.

And with that, I'm leaving the conversation.

C

On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:20:12 -0800 (PST), Sir Studly Spanksalot OBE
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Dec 4, 9:05*pm, "Voltaire's Child" <Voltaires_Ch...@ymail.com>
>wrote:
>> "XODDI" <root...@loa.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:[email protected] ...
>>
>> > You're all from that scientology group, aren't you?
>>
>> > Pro or con, you're all a bunch of neurotic cowardly retards.
>>
>> Oh, yeah, *that* makes sense. No matter what the stance is, everyone's a
>> neurotic cowardly retard. Riiiiight.
>
>My little newsgroup gets ****loads of xposts from a.r.s. weekly.
>
>So far my supposition has proven to be right. Your xpost included.
>
>All of you, scienofag and anti-scienofag, are nasty little ****s and
>have nothing of value to communicate to your betters.

Your mother and I are very disappointed in you.

Get a clue: Everyone who starts or posts to these threads are part of
the problem.

Bye

Tigger

On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:00:58 -0800 (PST), Tigger
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Get a clue: Everyone who starts or posts to these threads are part of
>the problem.
>
>Bye
>
>Tigger


ya think?

or don't ewe, sheep ****ee!