Thread: Has Muth been posting all this time?

On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
> posts themselves.

I noticed the same thing also...

On Oct 1, 5:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
> posts themselves.

I've been busy with real life stuff for several months and rfc was not
high on the priority list. I started posting again a week ago.

My posts don't seem to persist very long in the Google Archive.

--
Mike

Mike Muth <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 5:53 pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
>> posts themselves.
>
> I've been busy with real life stuff for several months and rfc was not
> high on the priority list. I started posting again a week ago.
>
> My posts don't seem to persist very long in the Google Archive.
>
> --
> Mike

Neither does sqwertz using goggle, there used to be a big red bar, saying
author does not wish to achieve. I don't see the bars. And goggle is
screwed up. Can't subscribe.

Greg

On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:53:34 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 wrote:

> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
> posts themselves.

Google killfiled him. He has not been posting up until recently.
He'll be gone again soon. But I have to admit now that he's not
nearly as bad as the current crop of ass-****ers.

-sw

On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT), merryb <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
> > posts themselves.
>
> I noticed the same thing also...

Me too.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:51:49 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT), merryb <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
>>> posts themselves.
>>
>> I noticed the same thing also...
>
> Me too.

Except that Spamtrap and Merry use Deja-Google to read and post to RFC
- which is the whole point of this thread. You use a real client and
news server. So if you're not seeing his posts then it's just plain
luser error.

Bobblehead Barbara strikes again.

-sw

On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:18:52 -0500, Bubba Yum <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:51:49 -0700, sf wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT), merryb <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
> >>> posts themselves.
> >>
> >> I noticed the same thing also...
> >
> > Me too.
>
> Except that Spamtrap and Merry use Deja-Google to read and post to RFC
> - which is the whole point of this thread. You use a real client and
> news server. So if you're not seeing his posts then it's just plain
> luser error.
>
> Bobblehead Barbara strikes again.
>
You're just as big of an asshole you ever were. No surprise.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On Monday, October 1, 2012 7:43:11 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:53:34 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
>
> > posts themselves.
>
>
>
> Google killfiled him. He has not been posting up until recently.
>
> He'll be gone again soon. But I have to admit now that he's not
>
> nearly as bad as the current crop of ass-****ers.
>
>
>
> -sw
===

Perhaps YOU could clean up your language Squertz...what a filthy mouthed
twit you are. Have you no shame?

===