Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Has Muth been posting all this time?

  1. #1
    spamtrap1888 Guest

    Default Has Muth been posting all this time?

    Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    posts themselves.

  2. #2
    merryb Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    > posts themselves.


    I noticed the same thing also...

  3. #3
    Mike Muth Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Oct 1, 5:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    > posts themselves.


    I've been busy with real life stuff for several months and rfc was not
    high on the priority list. I started posting again a week ago.

    My posts don't seem to persist very long in the Google Archive.

    --
    Mike

  4. #4
    gregz Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    Mike Muth <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Oct 1, 5:53 pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    >> posts themselves.

    >
    > I've been busy with real life stuff for several months and rfc was not
    > high on the priority list. I started posting again a week ago.
    >
    > My posts don't seem to persist very long in the Google Archive.
    >
    > --
    > Mike


    Neither does sqwertz using goggle, there used to be a big red bar, saying
    author does not wish to achieve. I don't see the bars. And goggle is
    screwed up. Can't subscribe.

    Greg

  5. #5
    Sqwertz Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:53:34 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 wrote:

    > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    > posts themselves.


    Google killfiled him. He has not been posting up until recently.
    He'll be gone again soon. But I have to admit now that he's not
    nearly as bad as the current crop of ass-****ers.

    -sw

  6. #6
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT), merryb <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    > > posts themselves.

    >
    > I noticed the same thing also...


    Me too.

    --
    I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

  7. #7
    Bubba Yum Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:51:49 -0700, sf wrote:

    > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT), merryb <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    >>> posts themselves.

    >>
    >> I noticed the same thing also...

    >
    > Me too.


    Except that Spamtrap and Merry use Deja-Google to read and post to RFC
    - which is the whole point of this thread. You use a real client and
    news server. So if you're not seeing his posts then it's just plain
    luser error.

    Bobblehead Barbara strikes again.

    -sw


  8. #8
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 22:18:52 -0500, Bubba Yum <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:51:49 -0700, sf wrote:
    >
    > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT), merryb <[email protected]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Oct 1, 3:53*pm, spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >>> Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the
    > >>> posts themselves.
    > >>
    > >> I noticed the same thing also...

    > >
    > > Me too.

    >
    > Except that Spamtrap and Merry use Deja-Google to read and post to RFC
    > - which is the whole point of this thread. You use a real client and
    > news server. So if you're not seeing his posts then it's just plain
    > luser error.
    >
    > Bobblehead Barbara strikes again.
    >

    You're just as big of an asshole you ever were. No surprise.

    --
    I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

  9. #9
    Roy Guest

    Default Re: Has Muth been posting all this time?

    On Monday, October 1, 2012 7:43:11 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
    > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:53:34 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > > Via google groups today, I see references to Muth posts, but not the

    >
    > > posts themselves.

    >
    >
    >
    > Google killfiled him. He has not been posting up until recently.
    >
    > He'll be gone again soon. But I have to admit now that he's not
    >
    > nearly as bad as the current crop of ass-****ers.
    >
    >
    >
    > -sw

    ===

    Perhaps YOU could clean up your language Squertz...what a filthy mouthed
    twit you are. Have you no shame?

    ===



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32