Thread: A few minutes of rfc chat?

On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
> A few minutes of rfc chat?

If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
>
> Andy

--Bryan

On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
>> A few minutes of rfc chat?
>
>If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
>(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
>would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
>>
>> Andy
>
What two partys are you talking about?


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Andy wrote:
> A few minutes of rfc chat?
>
> Andy

Its 10 P.M. on the coast?

.....


Io Pan!!
--
Joseph Littleshoes

Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy wrote:
>
>>A few minutes of rfc chat?
>
>
> If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
> (as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
> would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
>
>>Andy
>
>
> --Bryan

Its saturday night! im surprised there's no one there but me?

Oh ...wait....maybe that's when people aren't there?

I know my e mail slows down on weekends, i just get less....

Hmmmm.....
--

JL

On May 15, 11:49*pm, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
>
> <CLASS...@BRICK.NET> wrote:
> >On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >> A few minutes of rfc chat?
>
> >If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
> >(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
> >would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
>
> >> Andy
>
> What two partys are you talking about?

Any two hypothetical parties.. The "get a room" was a play on chat
room. I was wondering why move a conversation to chat. Privacy?
Surely not. Speed, yeah, there's that. The whole "get a room"
concept is funny to me because I don't mind public displays of
affection. Except at nudist camps, where such things pose a serious
threat to the existence of free body culture, I'm even fine with it
going beyond mere affection.

I may get grossed out by jarred mayo or other cooking horrors, but
never by two people kissing like they just want to eat each other up.
That applies even if I find one or both of them very unattractive.
Kisses are unqualifiedly good. I feel like I've had a pretty eventful
life to this point, but there could have been more of those close,
almost painfully personal kisses. I wonder, does almost everyone feel
like that?
Not a rhetorical question. Any replies would be appreciated. Kissing
a person whom one is really attracted to, and/or in love with is like
savoring one's favorite food, but w/o the calories, and you never end
up over-full, each moment being like a tiny, thrilling appetizer that
is great whether or not it is followed by the consumation of a meal.
I'll shut up now.

--Bryan

On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:32:25 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 15, 11:49*pm, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
>>
>> <CLASS...@BRICK.NET> wrote:
>> >On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
>> >> A few minutes of rfc chat?
>>
>> >If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
>> >(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
>> >would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
>>
>> >> Andy
>>
>> What two partys are you talking about?
>
>Any two hypothetical parties.. The "get a room" was a play on chat
>room. I was wondering why move a conversation to chat. Privacy?
>Surely not. Speed, yeah, there's that. The whole "get a room"
>concept is funny to me because I don't mind public displays of
>affection. Except at nudist camps, where such things pose a serious
>threat to the existence of free body culture, I'm even fine with it
>going beyond mere affection.
>

I've seen certain people dis exchanges like that here and suggest they
take it to email. I guess with rfc, they certainly could take it to
chat.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>
>
> Andy wrote:
>
>> A few minutes of rfc chat?
>>
>> Andy
>
>
> Its 10 P.M. on the coast?
>
> ....
>
>
> Io Pan!!

http://www.littleelmbears.com/media/...rack_8_10_.mp3
--
Joseph Littleshoes

"Bobo Bonobo®" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On May 15, 9:11 pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
> A few minutes of rfc chat?

If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??

--Bryan



Perhaps because in chat no one bitches if it's OT. It's just people
talking. It has nothing to do with bandwidth (or privacy).

Jill