Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: A few minutes of rfc chat?

  1. #1
    Andy Guest

    Default A few minutes of rfc chat?

    A few minutes of rfc chat?

    Andy
    --
    Eat first, talk later.

  2. #2
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bobo_Bonobo=AE?= Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?

    On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
    > A few minutes of rfc chat?


    If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
    (as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
    would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
    >
    > Andy


    --Bryan

  3. #3
    sf Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?

    On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
    >> A few minutes of rfc chat?

    >
    >If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
    >(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
    >would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
    >>
    >> Andy

    >

    What two partys are you talking about?


    --
    I love cooking with wine.
    Sometimes I even put it in the food.

  4. #4
    Joseph Littleshoes Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?



    Andy wrote:
    > A few minutes of rfc chat?
    >
    > Andy


    Its 10 P.M. on the coast?

    .....


    Io Pan!!
    --
    Joseph Littleshoes


  5. #5
    Joseph Littleshoes Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?



    Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
    > On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy wrote:
    >
    >>A few minutes of rfc chat?

    >
    >
    > If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
    > (as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
    > would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??
    >
    >>Andy

    >
    >
    > --Bryan


    Its saturday night! im surprised there's no one there but me?

    Oh ...wait....maybe that's when people aren't there?

    I know my e mail slows down on weekends, i just get less....

    Hmmmm.....
    --

    JL


  6. #6
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bobo_Bonobo=AE?= Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?

    On May 15, 11:49*pm, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    > On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
    >
    > <CLASS...@BRICK.NET> wrote:
    > >On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
    > >> A few minutes of rfc chat?

    >
    > >If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
    > >(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
    > >would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??

    >
    > >> Andy

    >
    > What two partys are you talking about?


    Any two hypothetical parties.. The "get a room" was a play on chat
    room. I was wondering why move a conversation to chat. Privacy?
    Surely not. Speed, yeah, there's that. The whole "get a room"
    concept is funny to me because I don't mind public displays of
    affection. Except at nudist camps, where such things pose a serious
    threat to the existence of free body culture, I'm even fine with it
    going beyond mere affection.

    I may get grossed out by jarred mayo or other cooking horrors, but
    never by two people kissing like they just want to eat each other up.
    That applies even if I find one or both of them very unattractive.
    Kisses are unqualifiedly good. I feel like I've had a pretty eventful
    life to this point, but there could have been more of those close,
    almost painfully personal kisses. I wonder, does almost everyone feel
    like that?
    Not a rhetorical question. Any replies would be appreciated. Kissing
    a person whom one is really attracted to, and/or in love with is like
    savoring one's favorite food, but w/o the calories, and you never end
    up over-full, each moment being like a tiny, thrilling appetizer that
    is great whether or not it is followed by the consumation of a meal.
    I'll shut up now.

    --Bryan


  7. #7
    sf Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?

    On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:32:25 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On May 15, 11:49*pm, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    >> On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo®
    >>
    >> <CLASS...@BRICK.NET> wrote:
    >> >On May 15, 9:11*pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
    >> >> A few minutes of rfc chat?

    >>
    >> >If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
    >> >(as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
    >> >would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??

    >>
    >> >> Andy

    >>
    >> What two partys are you talking about?

    >
    >Any two hypothetical parties.. The "get a room" was a play on chat
    >room. I was wondering why move a conversation to chat. Privacy?
    >Surely not. Speed, yeah, there's that. The whole "get a room"
    >concept is funny to me because I don't mind public displays of
    >affection. Except at nudist camps, where such things pose a serious
    >threat to the existence of free body culture, I'm even fine with it
    >going beyond mere affection.
    >


    I've seen certain people dis exchanges like that here and suggest they
    take it to email. I guess with rfc, they certainly could take it to
    chat.

    --
    I love cooking with wine.
    Sometimes I even put it in the food.

  8. #8
    Joseph Littleshoes Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?



    Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
    >
    >
    > Andy wrote:
    >
    >> A few minutes of rfc chat?
    >>
    >> Andy

    >
    >
    > Its 10 P.M. on the coast?
    >
    > ....
    >
    >
    > Io Pan!!


    http://www.littleelmbears.com/media/...rack_8_10_.mp3
    --
    Joseph Littleshoes


  9. #9
    jmcquown Guest

    Default Re: A few minutes of rfc chat?

    "Bobo Bonobo®" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    On May 15, 9:11 pm, Andy <a...@b.c> wrote:
    > A few minutes of rfc chat?


    If a couple of people posted messages back and forth fairly rapidly
    (as frequently used to happen on alt.punk), do you thing that someone
    would suggest that the two parties "get a room"??

    --Bryan



    Perhaps because in chat no one bitches if it's OT. It's just people
    talking. It has nothing to do with bandwidth (or privacy).

    Jill


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32