-
Dammit Cooks Illustrated
i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
this ingredient list:
2 large eggs
1 cup whole milk
1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
1/2 teaspoon table salt
1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
1 tablespoon vegetable oil
They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
future.
-goro-
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
In article
<[email protected]>,
Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
> this ingredient list:
>
> 2 large eggs
> 1 cup whole milk
> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
>
> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
>
> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> future.
>
> -goro-
Here's my recipe and method:
<http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
--
Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
Holy Order of the Sacred Sisters of St. Pectina of Jella
"Always in a jam, never in a stew; sometimes in a pickle."
Pepparkakor particulars posted 11-29-2010;
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article
><[email protected]>,
> Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
>> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
>> this ingredient list:
>>
>> 2 large eggs
>> 1 cup whole milk
>> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
>> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
>> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
>> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
>>
>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
>>
>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
>> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
>> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
>> future.
>>
>> -goro-
>
>
>Here's my recipe and method:
><http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
>ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
Barb, I noticed the cups in the oven picture, could a small water bath be used
to make them rise easier? Wouldn't be the same as yorkshire pudding, my
grandmother used the water bath for 60 yrs., always worked great.
--
Stu
So much more than just a recipe website
Recipe of the week "SPICY GARLIC PEPPER MEATBALLS"
http://foodforu.ca/recipeofweek.html
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article
><[email protected]>,
> Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
>> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
>> this ingredient list:
>>
>> 2 large eggs
>> 1 cup whole milk
>> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
>> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
>> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
>> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
>>
>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
>>
>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
>> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
>> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
>> future.
>>
>> -goro-
>
>
>Here's my recipe and method:
><http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
>ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. great idea. The
other way i had seen is using muffin pans. I wish i would tried
before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan.
so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in?
-goro-
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On Jan 22, 7:34*pm, Goro <evilnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> out perfect. *i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> 4.41 ounces. * Ugh! *I need to make sure i double check those weight
> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> future.
Doesn't the weight of flour depend a lot on its moisture content? I
would expect flour to be bone dry in most homes this time of year,
resulting in overuse of flour.
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On 1/23/2011 8:53 AM, Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> Here's my recipe and method:
> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
They look great! What is the full cooking time? I saw the comment about
"after 20 minutes" but they weren't finished yet. I am going to be
trying these. Even if just to serve to others.
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
"spamtrap1888" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Jan 22, 7:34 pm, Goro <evilnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> future.
Doesn't the weight of flour depend a lot on its moisture content? I
would expect flour to be bone dry in most homes this time of year,
resulting in overuse of flour.
----------------------------------------------------
There's very little difference in the weight of flour with varying humidity,
especially when you compare it to the huge variation if you use cup measure.
Graham
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:52:17 -0700, "graham" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "spamtrap1888" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> On Jan 22, 7:34 pm, Goro <evilnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> > Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> > out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> > 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
> > measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> > future.
>
> Doesn't the weight of flour depend a lot on its moisture content? I
> would expect flour to be bone dry in most homes this time of year,
> resulting in overuse of flour.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> There's very little difference in the weight of flour with varying humidity,
> especially when you compare it to the huge variation if you use cup measure.
> Graham
>
And that is why the twain shall never meet, spamtrap!
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
In article <[email protected]>,
Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Here's my recipe and method:
> ><http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
> >ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
>
> Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins.
Thank you. They are old Pyrex custard cups. The only place you'll find
them is in an antique shop, a thrift store, or a garage sale. Present
day ones, if they are even still made are shallower and have a wider
mouth. :-( Try eBay maybe.
> so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in?
I do not preheat my custard cups before pouring the batter.
> -goro-
--
Barb
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
In article <[email protected]>,
Stu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Here's my recipe and method:
> ><http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
> >ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
>
>
> Barb, I noticed the cups in the oven picture, could a small water bath be used
> to make them rise easier? Wouldn't be the same as yorkshire pudding, my
> grandmother used the water bath for 60 yrs., always worked great.
> Stu
I wouldn't dream of it. And I have no idea what you mean when you
talk about making them rise easier. They rise just fine.
What I think is interesting about the whole popover thang is that there
are recipes that work just fine and they start with a cold oven. That's
contrary to everything I know about the hot start.
--
Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
Holy Order of the Sacred Sisters of St. Pectina of Jella
"Always in a jam, never in a stew; sometimes in a pickle."
Pepparkakor particulars posted 11-29-2010;
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >Here's my recipe and method:
>> ><http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
>> >ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
>>
>> Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins.
>
>Thank you. They are old Pyrex custard cups. The only place you'll find
>them is in an antique shop, a thrift store, or a garage sale. Present
>day ones, if they are even still made are shallower and have a wider
>mouth. :-( Try eBay maybe.
This is a good source for Pyrex and all sorts of educational/home
economics cookware, etc.:
http://www.enasco.com/Search?q=pyrex&x=9&y=14
>> so you don't pre-heat your ramekins?
>
>I do not preheat my cups.
Hehe. . . Barb's are no ramekins! LOL
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On 2011-01-24, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> This is a good source for Pyrex and all sorts of educational/home
> economics cookware, etc.:
> http://www.enasco.com/Search?q=pyrex&x=9&y=14
Is that the good Pyrex or the Chinese exploding Pyrex?
nb
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
Has anyone tried the extra-deep silicone pan that looks like it was
made for 6 popovers?
-- Larry
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
Goro wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <[email protected]>,
>> Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
>>> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
>>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
>>> this ingredient list:
>>>
>>> 2 large eggs
>>> 1 cup whole milk
>>> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
>>> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
>>> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
>>> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
>>>
>>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
>>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
>>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
>>>
>>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
>>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
>>> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
>>> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
>>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
>>> future.
>>>
>>> -goro-
>>
>> Here's my recipe and method:
>> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
>> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
>
> Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. great idea. The
> other way i had seen is using muffin pans. I wish i would tried
> before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan.
>
> so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in?
>
> -goro-
Sounds like Barb and I are in agreement re cups and heating. One
other tip I have read--prick the necks of the popovers. I forget
when since I have not made them since I read this. Near the end
of the cooking? When done and put them back in the oven for a
tiny while?
--
Jean B.
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
On Jan 24, 11:31*am, "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote:
> Goro wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> > <barbschal...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> In article
> >> <d96a808b-d3e9-4a23-9779-2e28eb055...@z26g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> >> Goro <evilnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
> >>> a few years. *I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
> >>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). *I used
> >>> this ingredient list:
>
> >>> 2 * large eggs
> >>> 1 *cup whole milk
> >>> 1 *cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
> >>> 1/2 * * * *teaspoon table salt
> >>> 1 *tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
> >>> 1 *tablespoon vegetable oil
>
> >>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
> >>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
> >>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. *Same result.
>
> >>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> >>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> >>> out perfect. *i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> >>> 4.41 ounces. * Ugh! *I need to make sure i double check those weight
> >>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> >>> future.
>
> >>> -goro-
>
> >> Here's my recipe and method:
> >> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
> >> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> * Works a treat.
>
> > Nice! *And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. *great idea. The
> > other way i had seen is using muffin pans. *I wish i would tried
> > before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan. *
>
> > so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in? *
>
> > -goro-
>
> Sounds like Barb and I are in agreement re cups and heating. *One
> other tip I have read--prick the necks of the popovers. *I forget
> when since I have not made them since I read this. *Near the end
> of the cooking? *When done and put them back in the oven for a
> tiny while?
>
> --
> Jean B.
Is that to set the popovers so they don't fall afterwards?
-goro-
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
[email protected] wrote:
> Has anyone tried the extra-deep silicone pan that looks like it was
> made for 6 popovers?
>
> -- Larry
Larry,
I saw one that came with a metal rib "cradle" to keep the silicon pan
steady in and out and around the oven that might be worth a try. Make
sure the silicon will hold up to 450°F or higher, given any error in
oven temp. or your recipe's called for temp.
I stuck with the ol' faithful Chicago Metallic (made in Taiwan) brand 6-
cup one.
Best,
Andy
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
In article <[email protected]>, "Jean B." <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Goro wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> In article
> >> <[email protected]>,
> >> Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
> >>> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
> >>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
> >>> this ingredient list:
> >>>
> >>> 2 large eggs
> >>> 1 cup whole milk
> >>> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
> >>> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
> >>> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
> >>> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
> >>>
> >>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
> >>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
> >>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
> >>>
> >>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> >>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> >>> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> >>> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
> >>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> >>> future.
> >>>
> >>> -goro-
> >>
> >> Here's my recipe and method:
> >> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
> >> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
> >
> > Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. great idea. The
> > other way i had seen is using muffin pans. I wish i would tried
> > before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan.
> >
> > so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in?
> >
> > -goro-
> Sounds like Barb and I are in agreement re cups and heating. One
> other tip I have read--prick the necks of the popovers. I forget
> when since I have not made them since I read this. Near the end
> of the cooking?
:-> Can't do it at the beginning.
> When done and put them back in the oven for a
> tiny while?
That's a common recommendation but I never bother.
--
Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
Holy Order of the Sacred Sisters of St. Pectina of Jella
"Always in a jam, never in a stew; sometimes in a pickle."
Pepparkakor particulars posted 11-29-2010;
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
In article
<[email protected]>,
Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 11:31*am, "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote:
> > Goro wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
> > > <barbschal...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > >> In article
> > >> <d96a808b-d3e9-4a23-9779-2e28eb055...@z26g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> > >> Goro <evilnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
> > >>> a few years. *I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
> > >>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). *I used
> > >>> this ingredient list:
> >
> > >>> 2 * large eggs
> > >>> 1 *cup whole milk
> > >>> 1 *cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
> > >>> 1/2 * * * *teaspoon table salt
> > >>> 1 *tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
> > >>> 1 *tablespoon vegetable oil
> >
> > >>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
> > >>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
> > >>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. *Same result.
> >
> > >>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
> > >>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
> > >>> out perfect. *i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
> > >>> 4.41 ounces. * Ugh! *I need to make sure i double check those weight
> > >>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
> > >>> future.
> >
> > >>> -goro-
> >
> > >> Here's my recipe and method:
> > >> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
> > >> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> * Works a treat.
> >
> > > Nice! *And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. *great idea. The
> > > other way i had seen is using muffin pans. *I wish i would tried
> > > before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan. *
> >
> > > so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in? *
> >
> > > -goro-
> >
> > Sounds like Barb and I are in agreement re cups and heating. *One
> > other tip I have read--prick the necks of the popovers. *I forget
> > when since I have not made them since I read this. *Near the end
> > of the cooking? *When done and put them back in the oven for a
> > tiny while?
> >
> > --
> > Jean B.
>
> Is that to set the popovers so they don't fall afterwards?
>
> -goro-
I reckon. I've never had one collapse. Ever. And I never slit them.
--
Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
Holy Order of the Sacred Sisters of St. Pectina of Jella
"Always in a jam, never in a stew; sometimes in a pickle."
Pepparkakor particulars posted 11-29-2010;
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
Goro wrote:
> On Jan 24, 11:31 am, "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote:
>> Goro wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
>>> <barbschal...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> In article
>>>> <d96a808b-d3e9-4a23-9779-2e28eb055...@z26g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Goro <evilnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
>>>>> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
>>>>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
>>>>> this ingredient list:
>>>>> 2 large eggs
>>>>> 1 cup whole milk
>>>>> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
>>>>> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
>>>>> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
>>>>> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
>>>>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
>>>>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
>>>>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
>>>>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
>>>>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
>>>>> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
>>>>> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
>>>>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
>>>>> future.
>>>>> -goro-
>>>> Here's my recipe and method:
>>>> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
>>>> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
>>> Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. great idea. The
>>> other way i had seen is using muffin pans. I wish i would tried
>>> before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan.
>>> so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in?
>>> -goro-
>> Sounds like Barb and I are in agreement re cups and heating. One
>> other tip I have read--prick the necks of the popovers. I forget
>> when since I have not made them since I read this. Near the end
>> of the cooking? When done and put them back in the oven for a
>> tiny while?
>>
>> --
>> Jean B.
>
> Is that to set the popovers so they don't fall afterwards?
>
> -goro-
It's to release the steam.
--
Jean B.
-
Re: Dammit Cooks Illustrated
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, "Jean B." <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Goro wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:53:32 -0600, Melba's Jammin'
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <[email protected]>,
>>>> Goro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i was in the mood for popovers last weekend and have not made them in
>>>>> a few years. I dug into Cooks Illustrated and grabbed a recipe, which
>>>>> looked to be a basic one (butter, eggs, milk, flour, salt). I used
>>>>> this ingredient list:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2 large eggs
>>>>> 1 cup whole milk
>>>>> 1 cup unbleached all-purpose flour (5 ounces)
>>>>> 1/2 teaspoon table salt
>>>>> 1 tablespoon unsalted butter , melted
>>>>> 1 tablespoon vegetable oil
>>>>>
>>>>> They turned out ok tastewise but they really did not pop much at all.
>>>>> I thought maybe i hadn't heated the popover pan enough or let the
>>>>> mixture rest long enough so i tried again. Same result.
>>>>>
>>>>> This weekend, my scale was changed to grams (for whatever reason).
>>>>> Off the top of my head, i used 125g for 1cup of flour and it turned
>>>>> out perfect. i double check online for 1cup of flour and get 125g/
>>>>> 4.41 ounces. Ugh! I need to make sure i double check those weight
>>>>> measurements and/or make sure i remember them well enough in the
>>>>> future.
>>>>>
>>>>> -goro-
>>>> Here's my recipe and method:
>>>> <http://web.me.com/barbschaller/Hangi...ed_Lady/Blahbl
>>>> ahblog/Entries/2009/1/9_Popovers!.html> Works a treat.
>>> Nice! And i love the use of those buttered ramekins. great idea. The
>>> other way i had seen is using muffin pans. I wish i would tried
>>> before i spent the $20 or so on the popover pan.
>>>
>>> so you don't pre-heat your ramekins before putting the mixture in?
>>>
>>> -goro-
>> Sounds like Barb and I are in agreement re cups and heating. One
>> other tip I have read--prick the necks of the popovers. I forget
>> when since I have not made them since I read this. Near the end
>> of the cooking?
>
> :-> Can't do it at the beginning.
>
>
>> When done and put them back in the oven for a
>> tiny while?
>
> That's a common recommendation but I never bother.
>
Seems it can be done with or without putting them back in. The
one odd thing is that I recall my mom's popovers as being a very
dark brown. Mine never are. I suppose it is obvious what one
must do to alter that!
--
Jean B.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules