Thread: A collection of crock pot video recipes

[email protected] wrote:

> slow cooker pork
> recipe videos

And this douchebag thinks that people will work out the link to her site
from that mess?
LOL
--
ViLco
Let the liquor do the thinking

In article <itcker$o13$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > slow cooker pork
> > recipe videos
>
> And this douchebag thinks that people will work out the link to her site
> from that mess?

I just clicked on the part that appeared in blue in my newsreader and it
came right up.

Hint--it's the part after the "=" and before the "]". The link format
she's using should be easily decipherable by anyone who knows HTML.
It's not quite the same but close enough.

J. Clarke wrote:

>> And this douchebag thinks that people will work out the link to her
>> site from that mess?

> I just clicked on the part that appeared in blue in my newsreader and
> it came right up.

I didn't even try, but after reading your post I tried and got a 404 "bad
karma" error. Your newsreader (gravity) must have a vary good attitude at
repairing broken links
--
ViLco
Let the liquor do the thinking

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:54:56 +0200, "ViLco" <[email protected]> wrote:

>J. Clarke wrote:
>
>>> And this douchebag thinks that people will work out the link to her
>>> site from that mess?
>
>> I just clicked on the part that appeared in blue in my newsreader and
>> it came right up.
>
>I didn't even try, but after reading your post I tried and got a 404 "bad
>karma" error. Your newsreader (gravity) must have a vary good attitude at
>repairing broken links

Dropping the last directory from the URL is something anyone on the
net knows how to do with bad links. It looks like the videos were
disabled by the owner. They will probably be replaced later.

www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker

This works just fine.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:54:56 +0200, "ViLco" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I didn't even try, but after reading your post I tried and got a 404 "bad
> karma" error. Your newsreader (gravity) must have a vary good attitude at
> repairing broken links

I wasn't even interested until people started complaining about a bad
link. It works just fine. What's so hard about knocking off the url=
part between the brackets?

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

sf wrote:

> I wasn't even interested until people started complaining about a bad
> link.

I am not complaining, I'm just laughing at the bad formatting of that url

> It works just fine.

Not on my newsreader

> What's so hard about knocking off the url=
> part between the brackets?

Nothing so hard, expecially for one working in the IT for 12 years, in fact
I was referring to "people", if you can read
--
ViLco
Let the liquor do the thinking

Landon wrote:

> www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker
>
> This works just fine.

But not this:
http://www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker/]slow
which is what i get into the address bar of the browser if I click that
link.
BTW that's *spam*, so the point is: this spammers spams and even has the
guts to ask people to work around the link she provided. Sure a good move,
really
--
ViLco
Let the liquor do the thinking

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:20 +0200, "ViLco" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Landon wrote:
>
>> www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker
>>
>> This works just fine.
>
>But not this:
>http://www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker/]slow
>which is what i get into the address bar of the browser if I click that
>link.
>BTW that's *spam*, so the point is: this spammers spams and even has the
>guts to ask people to work around the link she provided. Sure a good move,
>really

It's actually a little kid in the videos. I don't see this as serious
spam. The kid does a pretty good job of presenting the recipes.
Nervous, like most kids on a "formal" presentation, but well done.

Give the kid a break man. You were one once. He's not selling a
product. He'll get a little revenue from page hits. Big deal.

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:32:09 +0200, "ViLco" <[email protected]> wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> > I wasn't even interested until people started complaining about a bad
> > link.
>
> I am not complaining, I'm just laughing at the bad formatting of that url
>
> > It works just fine.
>
> Not on my newsreader
>
> > What's so hard about knocking off the url=
> > part between the brackets?
>
> Nothing so hard, expecially for one working in the IT for 12 years, in fact
> I was referring to "people", if you can read

The third person is often used to indicate yourself without saying
"I".

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Jun 17, 6:30*pm, Landon <lan...@noreply.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:20 +0200, "ViLco" <villi...@tin.spam> wrote:
> >Landon wrote:
>
> >>www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker
>
> >> This works just fine.
>
> >But not this:
> >http://www.porkrecipesvideos.com/Slow-Cooker/]slow
> >which is what i get into the address bar of the browser if I click that
> >link.
> >BTW that's *spam*, so the point is: this spammers spams and even has the
> >guts to ask people to work around the link she provided. Sure a good move,
> >really
>
> It's actually a little kid in the videos. I don't see this as serious
> spam. The kid does a pretty good job of presenting the recipes.
> Nervous, like most kids on a "formal" presentation, but well done.
>
> Give the kid a break man. You were one once. He's not selling a
> product. He'll get a little revenue from page hits. Big deal.

Hi everyone, thanks for making the note about the code. I think it's
amazing to see a child take cooking so seriously. In a world full of
frozen dinners, it's nice to see the next generation still takes an
interest in real food!