Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

  1. #1
    mikeskinny22 Guest

    Default Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party


    New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?What do u think about it?
    Is it nice for New Year party?
    Give me some reviews.thx.




    --
    mikeskinny22

  2. #2
    Chemo the Clown Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
    <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
    > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > Give me some reviews.thx.
    >
    > --
    > mikeskinny22


    404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
    ok?

  3. #3
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
    > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
    > > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > > Give me some reviews.thx.
    > >
    > > --
    > > mikeskinny22

    >
    > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
    > ok?


    I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
    take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
    there. Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
    somewhere else.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  4. #4
    Chemo the Clown Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Dec 27, 11:59*am, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    >
    > <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
    > > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    > > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdou think about it?
    > > > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > > > Give me some reviews.thx.

    >
    > > > --
    > > > mikeskinny22

    >
    > > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
    > > ok?

    >
    > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
    > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
    > there. *Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
    > somewhere else.
    > --
    >
    > Ham and eggs.
    > A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.


    Google won't do anything.

  5. #5
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:02:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Dec 27, 11:59*am, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    > >
    > > <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
    > > > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    > > > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > > > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > > > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > > > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdou think about it?
    > > > > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > > > > Give me some reviews.thx.

    > >
    > > > > --
    > > > > mikeskinny22

    > >
    > > > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
    > > > ok?

    > >
    > > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
    > > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
    > > there. *Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
    > > somewhere else.
    > > --

    >
    > Google won't do anything.


    They aren't going to respond to your lone voice, but if enough of us
    do it maybe they will.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  6. #6
    Chemo the Clown Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Dec 27, 12:15*pm, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:02:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > On Dec 27, 11:59*am, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
    > > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown

    >
    > > > <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > > > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
    > > > > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    > > > > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > > > > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > > > > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > > > > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdouthink about it?
    > > > > > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > > > > > Give me some reviews.thx.

    >
    > > > > > --
    > > > > > mikeskinny22

    >
    > > > > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
    > > > > ok?

    >
    > > > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
    > > > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
    > > > there. *Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
    > > > somewhere else.
    > > > --

    >
    > > Google won't do anything.

    >
    > They aren't going to respond to your lone voice, but if enough of us
    > do it maybe they will.
    > --
    >
    > Ham and eggs.
    > A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.


    What's enough of us? Ten, twenty? you'd have to have hundreds for
    anyone at Google to even care a little.

  7. #7
    Dan Abel Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    In article <[email protected]>,
    sf <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
    > > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    > > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > > > (http://spammy.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
    > > > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > > > Give me some reviews.thx.


    > > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
    > > ok?

    >
    > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
    > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
    > there. Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
    > somewhere else.


    I'm not sure that reporting spam to Google does much good. They are in
    the spam business. I'd rather that people didn't respond to spam.
    However, if they do, PLEASE DON'T REPOST THE SPAM URL!!!

    Maybe the 404 came from somebody reporting spam to tinyurl? Reporting
    spam to foodbanter might work, also.

    --
    Dan Abel
    Petaluma, California USA
    [email protected]

  8. #8
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:32:39 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > What's enough of us? Ten, twenty? you'd have to have hundreds for
    > anyone at Google to even care a little.


    Who says they won't and who says it takes hundreds?
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  9. #9
    Dan Abel Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    In article <[email protected]>,
    sf <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:32:39 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > What's enough of us? Ten, twenty? you'd have to have hundreds for
    > > anyone at Google to even care a little.

    >
    > Who says they won't and who says it takes hundreds?


    *Everybody* knows that.

    :-)

    Besides, how did Google get into this? He didn't post using GG, and he
    didn't use a Google Email address. Google can't do anything except
    delete his posts from their archive, which won't affect you, I and 99%
    percent of the people who use rfc.

    --
    Dan Abel
    Petaluma, California USA
    [email protected]

  10. #10
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:45:54 -0800, Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Besides, how did Google get into this? He didn't post using GG, and he
    > didn't use a Google Email address. Google can't do anything except
    > delete his posts from their archive, which won't affect you, I and 99%
    > percent of the people who use rfc.


    I'd love to see them deleted from Google's archives. I'm pretty sure
    that's the gold standard for spammers anyway because I rarely (if
    ever) see them through my news server. It's a cheap one but not so
    cheap that it doesn't predelete spam.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  11. #11
    Melba's Jammin' Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    In article <[email protected]>,
    mikeskinny22 <[email protected]> wrote:

    > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    > (http://tinyurl.comWhat do u think about it?
    > Is it nice for New Year party?
    > Give me some reviews.thx.


    These requests are starting to tickle my funny bone.
    --
    Barb,
    http://web.me.com/barbschaller September 5, 2011

  12. #12
    Nunya Bidnits Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Dec 26, 11:17 pm, mikeskinny22
    >> <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
    >>> New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
    >>> I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
    >>> have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
    >>> (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
    >>> Is it nice for New Year party?
    >>> Give me some reviews.thx.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> mikeskinny22

    >>
    >> 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to
    >> soon, ok?

    >
    > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
    > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
    > there. Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
    > somewhere else.


    Are you under the impression that reporting Usenet spam to Google is
    worthwhile in any way? It's not. They don't care about spammers using GG,
    and they have no control over spam from any other source.

    I would have to sign in to Google, which requires giving an email address,
    to the most notorious harvester of personal data on the planet, and then use
    the most cumbersome navigation method possible to find the post in question,
    and then fill out a complaint form, because said harvester does not accept
    normal emailed abuse reports, so that Google can ignore it as they always do
    with spam and malicious behavior reports. And then, if your problem is with
    a serial abuser or nameshifter, you find that said complaint form does not
    allow you to report serial offender information. One report per post, no
    matter how many time the abuser posts.

    I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
    did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.

    MartyB




  13. #13
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
    > did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.
    >


    Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
    your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
    Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
    theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
    have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
    - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
    saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
    remove the offending spam post from their feed.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  14. #14
    Dan Abel Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    In article <[email protected]>,
    sf <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
    > > did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.
    > >

    >
    > Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
    > your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
    > Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
    > theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
    > have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
    > - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
    > saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
    > remove the offending spam post from their feed.


    Seems silly to me. Why don't you report spam to every single news
    server in the world?

    If I was to report spam, I don't want them to merely remove that one
    piece of spam, I want them to delete the account. If the spam wasn't

    generated from GG, or using a Gmail Email, then there is no account to
    yank.

    --
    Dan Abel
    Petaluma, California USA
    [email protected]

  15. #15
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:19:48 -0800, Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    > > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
    > > > did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.
    > > >

    > >
    > > Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
    > > your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
    > > Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
    > > theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
    > > have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
    > > - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
    > > saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
    > > remove the offending spam post from their feed.

    >
    > Seems silly to me. Why don't you report spam to every single news
    > server in the world?


    Only an idiot would say that.
    >
    > If I was to report spam, I don't want them to merely remove that one
    > piece of spam, I want them to delete the account.
    >

    Okay, suspicion confirmed. Remove that Spam from the Google news
    feed. At the very least, it will least make spammers less effective.

    > If the spam wasn't generated from GG, or using a Gmail Email, then there
    > is no account to yank.


    It's the I'm the Big Bad Man who will fix everything syndrome. Why do
    men always think first about the "omnipotent" thing? What a crock.
    Do I have to draw a picture? Spam here, eraser there, take eraser to
    spam in Google feed - spam posts gone. What can't you two understand?
    The Google feed obviously lets them reach a maximum audience because
    nothing is pre-filtered there. Erase spam posts from Google's news
    feed and a major (behavior) reinforcer is gone.

    Added benefit: I don't have to see that crap when I have to read or
    post from Google.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  16. #16
    Doug Freyburger Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    sf wrote:
    >
    > JI want Google to remove spam from their
    > Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
    > theirs.


    Lots of people "want" google to remove spam posts from their display.
    They don't and they also don't reply to spam complaints. I tried
    reporting spam and abuse for a long time. Like so many others I
    eventually gave up and concluded they ignore all such complaints. I
    wish they did otherwise, but if wishes were horses ...

  17. #17
    Nunya Bidnits Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google
    >> which did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in
    >> foodbanter.
    >>

    >
    > Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
    > your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
    > Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
    > theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
    > have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
    > - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
    > saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
    > remove the offending spam post from their feed.


    Get a clue... complain all you want, Google doesn't care, and does not act
    on your complaints. There are methods by which they identify the largest
    sources of spam at any time and they can hit those with a BFH. Otherwise
    they don't care, even though their free gmail accounts make it possible for
    hit and run GG spammers to flourish.

    If you are actually thinking that they remove a spam message from their feed
    when you report it, by all means, give it a try. I'm certain you'll be
    disappointed with your Google Groups Customer Service Quick Response Team.

    This is one of the main reasons people hate Google and GG... because they
    not only don't care about spammers, scammers, and abusers, but worse, they
    actually facilitate their activities. You don't even see much forged spam on
    Usenet any more, because the spammers don't care if you can track their
    headers or not. They just sign up for a gmail account and use it to post
    spam until it is detected by cumulative screening methods, then they move
    on.

    Note that you cannot report on anything cumulative using the sad little
    reporting page GG gives you to appease your outrage. Those reports are there
    to make you feel good, and are summarily ignored.

    MartyB



  18. #18
    Nunya Bidnits Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:19:48 -0800, Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> In article <[email protected]>,
    >> sf <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to
    >>>> Google which did not originate in Google in the first place, but
    >>>> rather in foodbanter.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
    >>> your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
    >>> Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
    >>> theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
    >>> have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the
    >>> spam - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would
    >>> take my saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything
    >>> more than remove the offending spam post from their feed.

    >>
    >> Seems silly to me. Why don't you report spam to every single news
    >> server in the world?

    >
    > Only an idiot would say that.
    >>
    >> If I was to report spam, I don't want them to merely remove that one
    >> piece of spam, I want them to delete the account.
    >>

    > Okay, suspicion confirmed. Remove that Spam from the Google news
    > feed. At the very least, it will least make spammers less effective.


    Seriously? You think removing one spam message, which has already been
    propagated worldwide and largely decided as to value by a huge number of
    readers by the time you see it, is going to have some kind of effect on
    spammers? ROFLMAO! To use your terms, since it's only fair, only an idiot
    would say that.


    >
    >> If the spam wasn't generated from GG, or using a Gmail Email, then
    >> there is no account to yank.

    >
    > It's the I'm the Big Bad Man who will fix everything syndrome. Why do
    > men always think first about the "omnipotent" thing? What a crock.
    > Do I have to draw a picture? Spam here, eraser there, take eraser to
    > spam in Google feed - spam posts gone. What can't you two understand?


    It's what you are unable to understand which is the problem. Google won't
    remove your individual spam messages. If they could it would make no
    difference, the damage is done and the spammers have moved on.

    Let's try this one more time. GG facititates spam with free gmail accounts.
    The do not respond to your complaints. Are you able to make a connection to
    reality from there?


    > The Google feed obviously lets them reach a maximum audience because
    > nothing is pre-filtered there. Erase spam posts from Google's news
    > feed and a major (behavior) reinforcer is gone.


    Seriously? You actually think that erasing old spam posts makes any
    difference, as if there are huge numbers of people out there scanning old
    Usenet posts and reading all the spam? On what planet, in what universe, do
    you imagine this is happening?

    >
    > Added benefit: I don't have to see that crap when I have to read or
    > post from Google.


    There is no such thing as a benefit to reading or posting Usenet from
    Google.

    MartyB



  19. #19
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:51:13 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Get a clue... complain all you want, Google doesn't care, and does not act
    > on your complaints. There are methods by which they identify the largest
    > sources of spam at any time and they can hit those with a BFH. Otherwise
    > they don't care, even though their free gmail accounts make it possible for
    > hit and run GG spammers to flourish.
    >
    > If you are actually thinking that they remove a spam message from their feed
    > when you report it, by all means, give it a try. I'm certain you'll be
    > disappointed with your Google Groups Customer Service Quick Response Team.


    Marty, you are just blowing it out your ass because you don't know
    diddly. Give up.
    >
    > This is one of the main reasons people hate Google and GG... because they
    > not only don't care about spammers, scammers, and abusers, but worse, they
    > actually facilitate their activities. You don't even see much forged spam on
    > Usenet any more, because the spammers don't care if you can track their
    > headers or not. They just sign up for a gmail account and use it to post
    > spam until it is detected by cumulative screening methods, then they move
    > on.
    >
    > Note that you cannot report on anything cumulative using the sad little
    > reporting page GG gives you to appease your outrage. Those reports are there
    > to make you feel good, and are summarily ignored.
    >

    More crap.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  20. #20
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

    On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:58:24 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    > Seriously? You think removing one spam message, which has already been
    > propagated worldwide and largely decided as to value by a huge number of
    > readers by the time you see it, is going to have some kind of effect on
    > spammers? ROFLMAO! To use your terms, since it's only fair, only an idiot
    > would say that.


    I repeat - you're an idiot.
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32