Thread: Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set for New Year's party

On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
<mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
> New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
> Is it nice for New Year party?
> Give me some reviews.thx.
>
> --
> mikeskinny22

404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
ok?

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
> <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
> > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
> > Is it nice for New Year party?
> > Give me some reviews.thx.
> >
> > --
> > mikeskinny22
>
> 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
> ok?

I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
there. Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
somewhere else.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

On Dec 27, 11:59*am, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
>
> <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
> > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
> > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdou think about it?
> > > Is it nice for New Year party?
> > > Give me some reviews.thx.
>
> > > --
> > > mikeskinny22
>
> > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
> > ok?
>
> I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
> take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
> there. *Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
> somewhere else.
> --
>
> Ham and eggs.
> A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

Google won't do anything.

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:02:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Dec 27, 11:59*am, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
> >
> > <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
> > > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
> > > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> > > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> > > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> > > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdou think about it?
> > > > Is it nice for New Year party?
> > > > Give me some reviews.thx.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > mikeskinny22
> >
> > > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
> > > ok?
> >
> > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
> > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
> > there. *Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
> > somewhere else.
> > --
>
> Google won't do anything.

They aren't going to respond to your lone voice, but if enough of us
do it maybe they will.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

On Dec 27, 12:15*pm, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:02:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 27, 11:59*am, sf <s...@geemail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
>
> > > <bhansen1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
> > > > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
> > > > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> > > > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> > > > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> > > > > (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdouthink about it?
> > > > > Is it nice for New Year party?
> > > > > Give me some reviews.thx.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > mikeskinny22
>
> > > > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
> > > > ok?
>
> > > I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
> > > take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
> > > there. *Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
> > > somewhere else.
> > > --
>
> > Google won't do anything.
>
> They aren't going to respond to your lone voice, but if enough of us
> do it maybe they will.
> --
>
> Ham and eggs.
> A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

What's enough of us? Ten, twenty? you'd have to have hundreds for
anyone at Google to even care a little.

In article <[email protected]>,
sf <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 11:17*pm, mikeskinny22
> > <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
> > > New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> > > I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> > > have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> > > (http://spammy.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
> > > Is it nice for New Year party?
> > > Give me some reviews.thx.

> > 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to soon,
> > ok?
>
> I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
> take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
> there. Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
> somewhere else.

I'm not sure that reporting spam to Google does much good. They are in
the spam business. I'd rather that people didn't respond to spam.
However, if they do, PLEASE DON'T REPOST THE SPAM URL!!!

Maybe the 404 came from somebody reporting spam to tinyurl? Reporting
spam to foodbanter might work, also.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:32:39 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What's enough of us? Ten, twenty? you'd have to have hundreds for
> anyone at Google to even care a little.

Who says they won't and who says it takes hundreds?
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

In article <[email protected]>,
sf <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:32:39 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > What's enough of us? Ten, twenty? you'd have to have hundreds for
> > anyone at Google to even care a little.
>
> Who says they won't and who says it takes hundreds?

*Everybody* knows that.

:-)

Besides, how did Google get into this? He didn't post using GG, and he
didn't use a Google Email address. Google can't do anything except
delete his posts from their archive, which won't affect you, I and 99%
percent of the people who use rfc.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:45:54 -0800, Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Besides, how did Google get into this? He didn't post using GG, and he
> didn't use a Google Email address. Google can't do anything except
> delete his posts from their archive, which won't affect you, I and 99%
> percent of the people who use rfc.

I'd love to see them deleted from Google's archives. I'm pretty sure
that's the gold standard for spammers anyway because I rarely (if
ever) see them through my news server. It's a cheap one but not so
cheap that it doesn't predelete spam.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

In article <[email protected]>,
mikeskinny22 <[email protected]> wrote:

> New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
> I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
> have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
> (http://tinyurl.comWhat do u think about it?
> Is it nice for New Year party?
> Give me some reviews.thx.

These requests are starting to tickle my funny bone.
--
Barb,
http://web.me.com/barbschaller September 5, 2011

sf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:44:00 -0800 (PST), Chemo the Clown
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 26, 11:17 pm, mikeskinny22
>> <mikeskinny22.93f3ec8.210...@foodbanter.com> wrote:
>>> New Year is coming,we will hold a party at home.
>>> I am looking for a new dinnerware set for this party.Has anyone of u
>>> have seen this 'Christmas Cheers 16 Pc Dinnerware Set'
>>> (http://tinyurl.com/cjlldzx)?Whatdo u think about it?
>>> Is it nice for New Year party?
>>> Give me some reviews.thx.
>>>
>>> --
>>> mikeskinny22
>>
>> 404 error. do your own research and get back to us....but not to
>> soon, ok?
>
> I wish that everyone who takes the time to reply to spam would also
> take the time to go to rfc via google groups and report the OP as spam
> there. Maybe we can make it annoying enough for them that they go
> somewhere else.

Are you under the impression that reporting Usenet spam to Google is
worthwhile in any way? It's not. They don't care about spammers using GG,
and they have no control over spam from any other source.

I would have to sign in to Google, which requires giving an email address,
to the most notorious harvester of personal data on the planet, and then use
the most cumbersome navigation method possible to find the post in question,
and then fill out a complaint form, because said harvester does not accept
normal emailed abuse reports, so that Google can ignore it as they always do
with spam and malicious behavior reports. And then, if your problem is with
a serial abuser or nameshifter, you find that said complaint form does not
allow you to report serial offender information. One report per post, no
matter how many time the abuser posts.

I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.

MartyB

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
> did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.
>

Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
- I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
remove the offending spam post from their feed.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

In article <[email protected]>,
sf <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
> > did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.
> >
>
> Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
> your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
> Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
> theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
> have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
> - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
> saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
> remove the offending spam post from their feed.

Seems silly to me. Why don't you report spam to every single news
server in the world?

If I was to report spam, I don't want them to merely remove that one
piece of spam, I want them to delete the account. If the spam wasn't

generated from GG, or using a Gmail Email, then there is no account to
yank.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:19:48 -0800, Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> sf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google which
> > > did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in foodbanter.
> > >
> >
> > Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
> > your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
> > Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
> > theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
> > have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
> > - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
> > saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
> > remove the offending spam post from their feed.
>
> Seems silly to me. Why don't you report spam to every single news
> server in the world?

Only an idiot would say that.
>
> If I was to report spam, I don't want them to merely remove that one
> piece of spam, I want them to delete the account.
>
Okay, suspicion confirmed. Remove that Spam from the Google news
feed. At the very least, it will least make spammers less effective.

> If the spam wasn't generated from GG, or using a Gmail Email, then there
> is no account to yank.

It's the I'm the Big Bad Man who will fix everything syndrome. Why do
men always think first about the "omnipotent" thing? What a crock.
Do I have to draw a picture? Spam here, eraser there, take eraser to
spam in Google feed - spam posts gone. What can't you two understand?
The Google feed obviously lets them reach a maximum audience because
nothing is pre-filtered there. Erase spam posts from Google's news
feed and a major (behavior) reinforcer is gone.

Added benefit: I don't have to see that crap when I have to read or
post from Google.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

sf wrote:
>
> JI want Google to remove spam from their
> Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
> theirs.

Lots of people "want" google to remove spam posts from their display.
They don't and they also don't reply to spam complaints. I tried
reporting spam and abuse for a long time. Like so many others I
eventually gave up and concluded they ignore all such complaints. I
wish they did otherwise, but if wishes were horses ...

sf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to Google
>> which did not originate in Google in the first place, but rather in
>> foodbanter.
>>
>
> Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
> your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
> Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
> theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
> have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the spam
> - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would take my
> saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything more than
> remove the offending spam post from their feed.

Get a clue... complain all you want, Google doesn't care, and does not act
on your complaints. There are methods by which they identify the largest
sources of spam at any time and they can hit those with a BFH. Otherwise
they don't care, even though their free gmail accounts make it possible for
hit and run GG spammers to flourish.

If you are actually thinking that they remove a spam message from their feed
when you report it, by all means, give it a try. I'm certain you'll be
disappointed with your Google Groups Customer Service Quick Response Team.

This is one of the main reasons people hate Google and GG... because they
not only don't care about spammers, scammers, and abusers, but worse, they
actually facilitate their activities. You don't even see much forged spam on
Usenet any more, because the spammers don't care if you can track their
headers or not. They just sign up for a gmail account and use it to post
spam until it is detected by cumulative screening methods, then they move
on.

Note that you cannot report on anything cumulative using the sad little
reporting page GG gives you to appease your outrage. Those reports are there
to make you feel good, and are summarily ignored.

MartyB

sf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:19:48 -0800, Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> sf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:00:17 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I also don't understand why I would want to report a post to
>>>> Google which did not originate in Google in the first place, but
>>>> rather in foodbanter.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just because YOU don't use Google doesn't mean no one does, so pull
>>> your head out of the sand. I want Google to remove spam from their
>>> Google Groups feed, just like other news providers remove spam from
>>> theirs. I have a gmail address and I'm usually signed in, so if I
>>> have to use GG for some reason and am hit in the face by all the
>>> spam - I DO report it. I don't know why you or anyone else would
>>> take my saying to report spam as me thinking they would do anything
>>> more than remove the offending spam post from their feed.
>>
>> Seems silly to me. Why don't you report spam to every single news
>> server in the world?
>
> Only an idiot would say that.
>>
>> If I was to report spam, I don't want them to merely remove that one
>> piece of spam, I want them to delete the account.
>>
> Okay, suspicion confirmed. Remove that Spam from the Google news
> feed. At the very least, it will least make spammers less effective.

Seriously? You think removing one spam message, which has already been
propagated worldwide and largely decided as to value by a huge number of
readers by the time you see it, is going to have some kind of effect on
spammers? ROFLMAO! To use your terms, since it's only fair, only an idiot
would say that.


>
>> If the spam wasn't generated from GG, or using a Gmail Email, then
>> there is no account to yank.
>
> It's the I'm the Big Bad Man who will fix everything syndrome. Why do
> men always think first about the "omnipotent" thing? What a crock.
> Do I have to draw a picture? Spam here, eraser there, take eraser to
> spam in Google feed - spam posts gone. What can't you two understand?

It's what you are unable to understand which is the problem. Google won't
remove your individual spam messages. If they could it would make no
difference, the damage is done and the spammers have moved on.

Let's try this one more time. GG facititates spam with free gmail accounts.
The do not respond to your complaints. Are you able to make a connection to
reality from there?


> The Google feed obviously lets them reach a maximum audience because
> nothing is pre-filtered there. Erase spam posts from Google's news
> feed and a major (behavior) reinforcer is gone.

Seriously? You actually think that erasing old spam posts makes any
difference, as if there are huge numbers of people out there scanning old
Usenet posts and reading all the spam? On what planet, in what universe, do
you imagine this is happening?

>
> Added benefit: I don't have to see that crap when I have to read or
> post from Google.

There is no such thing as a benefit to reading or posting Usenet from
Google.

MartyB

On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:51:13 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Get a clue... complain all you want, Google doesn't care, and does not act
> on your complaints. There are methods by which they identify the largest
> sources of spam at any time and they can hit those with a BFH. Otherwise
> they don't care, even though their free gmail accounts make it possible for
> hit and run GG spammers to flourish.
>
> If you are actually thinking that they remove a spam message from their feed
> when you report it, by all means, give it a try. I'm certain you'll be
> disappointed with your Google Groups Customer Service Quick Response Team.

Marty, you are just blowing it out your ass because you don't know
diddly. Give up.
>
> This is one of the main reasons people hate Google and GG... because they
> not only don't care about spammers, scammers, and abusers, but worse, they
> actually facilitate their activities. You don't even see much forged spam on
> Usenet any more, because the spammers don't care if you can track their
> headers or not. They just sign up for a gmail account and use it to post
> spam until it is detected by cumulative screening methods, then they move
> on.
>
> Note that you cannot report on anything cumulative using the sad little
> reporting page GG gives you to appease your outrage. Those reports are there
> to make you feel good, and are summarily ignored.
>
More crap.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:58:24 -0600, "Nunya Bidnits"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Seriously? You think removing one spam message, which has already been
> propagated worldwide and largely decided as to value by a huge number of
> readers by the time you see it, is going to have some kind of effect on
> spammers? ROFLMAO! To use your terms, since it's only fair, only an idiot
> would say that.

I repeat - you're an idiot.
--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.