Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

  1. #1
    cshenk Guest

    Default Chat? Havent done it in a bit!


    Wondering if any others want to chat?

    --


  2. #2
    cshenk Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    cshenk wrote in rec.food.cooking:

    >
    > Wondering if any others want to chat?


    http://www.recfoodcooking.org/chat.html

    --


  3. #3
    Brooklyn1 Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    "cshenk" wrote:
    >
    >Wondering if any others want to chat?


    What are my other choices?

  4. #4
    Chemo the Clown Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Oct 1, 1:10*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
    > "cshenk" wrote:
    >
    > >Wondering if any others want to chat?

    >
    > What are my other choices?


    Go in the bathroom and play with yourself.

  5. #5
    M. JL Esq. Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    cshenk wrote:
    > Wondering if any others want to chat?
    >



    I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its been
    empty for the last few weeks at that time.

    It would be nice to se some more activity there.
    --
    JL

  6. #6
    cshenk Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:

    > "cshenk" wrote:
    > >
    > > Wondering if any others want to chat?

    >
    > What are my other choices?


    Hehehehe post messages! No one came in anyways so i wandered out of
    chat. There's a small cadre of us who enjoy a weekend chat for a few
    hours. Harmless and generally everyone is pretty polite in chat there.

    --


  7. #7
    cshenk Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:

    > cshenk wrote:
    > > Wondering if any others want to chat?
    > >

    >
    >
    > I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    > been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    >
    > It would be nice to se some more activity there.


    I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.

    --


  8. #8
    Sky Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On 10/1/2011 2:06 PM, cshenk wrote:
    >
    > Wondering if any others want to chat?


    A few folks are chatting now Merry conversations!

    Sky

    --

    Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
    Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!!

  9. #9
    M. JL Esq. Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    cshenk wrote:

    > M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
    >
    >
    >>cshenk wrote:
    >>
    >>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    >>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    >>
    >>It would be nice to se some more activity there.

    >
    >
    > I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    > don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    > tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
    >


    Sky & i right now, SF popped in and out
    --
    JL

  10. #10
    M. JL Esq. Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    Sqwertz wrote:

    > On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
    >
    >
    >>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
    >>
    >>
    >>>cshenk wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    >>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    >>>
    >>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.

    >>
    >>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    >>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    >>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.

    >
    >
    > If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
    > logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
    > them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
    > SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
    >
    > -sw



    Are you really THAT dense?
    --
    JL

  11. #11
    Julie Bove Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!


    "Chemo the Clown" <bhansen194[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    On Oct 1, 1:10 pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
    > "cshenk" wrote:
    >
    > >Wondering if any others want to chat?

    >
    > What are my other choices?


    Go in the bathroom and play with yourself.

    In the bathroom? Why?



  12. #12
    blake murphy Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 22:18:01 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:

    > "Chemo the Clown" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]..
    > On Oct 1, 1:10 pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
    >> "cshenk" wrote:
    >>
    >>>Wondering if any others want to chat?

    >>
    >> What are my other choices?

    >
    > Go in the bathroom and play with yourself.
    >
    > In the bathroom? Why?


    he doesn't want the cats to see him jack off.

    your pal,
    blake

  13. #13
    blake murphy Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:

    > Sqwertz wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
    >>
    >>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>cshenk wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    >>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    >>>>
    >>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
    >>>
    >>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    >>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    >>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.

    >>
    >> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
    >> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
    >> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
    >> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
    >>
    >> -sw

    >
    > Are you really THAT dense?


    what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
    done it in a bit! cshenk <[email protected]> 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
    hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.

    blake

  14. #14
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
    >
    > > Sqwertz wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
    > >>
    > >>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>>cshenk wrote:
    > >>>>
    > >>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    > >>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    > >>>>
    > >>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
    > >>>
    > >>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    > >>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    > >>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
    > >>
    > >> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
    > >> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
    > >> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
    > >> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
    > >>
    > >> -sw

    > >
    > > Are you really THAT dense?

    >
    > what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
    > done it in a bit! cshenk <[email protected]> 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
    > hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
    >


    JL sees the situation clearly.

    --

    You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts.

  15. #15
    Mike Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!


    "Sqwertz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:1bf8eush8hgvf$.[email protected]..
    > On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:06:18 -0500, cshenk wrote:
    >
    >> Wondering if any others want to chat?

    >
    > Hello!
    >
    > (There, that will tide me over for another decade without chat lust)
    >
    > -sw


    Andy you suck! ok I'm good too



  16. #16
    blake murphy Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:40:09 -0700, sf wrote:

    > On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
    >>
    >>> Sqwertz wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>cshenk wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    >>>>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    >>>>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    >>>>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
    >>>>
    >>>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
    >>>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
    >>>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
    >>>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
    >>>>
    >>>> -sw
    >>>
    >>> Are you really THAT dense?

    >>
    >> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
    >> done it in a bit! cshenk <[email protected]> 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
    >> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
    >>

    >
    > JL sees the situation clearly.


    how so? post a notice here that you'll be in chat that many won't see
    until a day later?

    your pal,
    blake

  17. #17
    sf Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:25:01 -0400, blake murphy
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:40:09 -0700, sf wrote:
    >
    > > On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
    > > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
    > >>
    > >>> Sqwertz wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
    > >>>>
    > >>>>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>>cshenk wrote:
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
    > >>>>>>>
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
    > >>>>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
    > >>>>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
    > >>>>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
    > >>>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
    > >>>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
    > >>>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> -sw
    > >>>
    > >>> Are you really THAT dense?
    > >>
    > >> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
    > >> done it in a bit! cshenk <[email protected]> 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
    > >> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
    > >>

    > >
    > > JL sees the situation clearly.

    >
    > how so? post a notice here that you'll be in chat that many won't see
    > until a day later?
    >

    Those who are active in rfc and want to chat can do so, the rest don't
    care. Steve has no friends who want to chat with him and that's what
    his problem is (he can chat to high heaven on FB but apparently he
    doesn't).

    Why is posting a chat notice such a problem for you? If you see it a
    day later, it means you weren't reading rfc and you weren't available
    to chat. So what? It's no skin off your nose. Chat is open to
    (almost) everyone and it's nice to see new faces there, something that
    would never happen with a private (in crowd only) mailing list.


    --

    You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts.

  18. #18
    blake murphy Guest

    Default Re: Chat? Havent done it in a bit!

    On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:34:27 -0700, sf wrote:

    > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:25:01 -0400, blake murphy
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:40:09 -0700, sf wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
    >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
    >>>>>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
    >>>>>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
    >>>>>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> -sw
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Are you really THAT dense?
    >>>>
    >>>> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
    >>>> done it in a bit! cshenk <[email protected]> 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
    >>>> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> JL sees the situation clearly.

    >>
    >> how so? post a notice here that you'll be in chat that many won't see
    >> until a day later?
    >>

    > Those who are active in rfc and want to chat can do so, the rest don't
    > care. Steve has no friends who want to chat with him and that's what
    > his problem is (he can chat to high heaven on FB but apparently he
    > doesn't).
    >
    > Why is posting a chat notice such a problem for you? If you see it a
    > day later, it means you weren't reading rfc and you weren't available
    > to chat. So what? It's no skin off your nose. Chat is open to
    > (almost) everyone and it's nice to see new faces there, something that
    > would never happen with a private (in crowd only) mailing list.


    it's not a problem at all for me. but j.l. seemed to be saying steve was
    stupid for pointing out that usenet was not the ideal venue to point out
    your availability for chat and i disagreed for the reason stated.

    your pal,
    blake

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32