Thread: Anyone know

On 2010-05-24 08:34:16 -0700, Stu said:

> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
> contact the AG in that state.

Google around. How many Bob Terwilligers could there be?

On 5/24/2010 11:34 AM, Stu wrote:
>
> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
> contact the AG in that state.
>
>
> --
> Stu
>
> URL: http://foodforu.ca -- Email: [email protected]
> Follow us on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Foods4u
> So much more than just a Recipe Website

Springfield of course...

George wrote:

> Springfield of course...

Doh! ;-)

--Lin (my bad Homer impersonation)

Stu-Pid wrote:

> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
> contact the AG in that state.

You mewl out empty threat after empty threat, and nothing comes of it. Your
impotence is hilarious.

Bob

In article <[email protected]>,
Stu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
> contact the AG in that state.

I believe it's the state of Harmony.
> --
> Stu

--
Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
http://web.me.com/barbschaller
Updated 4-24-2010 with food story and pictures

On Mon, 24 May 2010 11:56:43 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
<virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:

>Stu-Pid wrote:
>
>> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
>> contact the AG in that state.
>
>You mewl out empty threat after empty threat, and nothing comes of it. Your
>impotence is hilarious.
>
>Bob

Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing
kids. I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
mistaken. They will open an investigation after reading your posts,
that you can bet on.

You are now killfiled.

Stu wrote:

> Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing kids.

If the shoe fits, wear it.


> I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
> agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
> mistaken.

*yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.


> They will open an investigation after reading your posts, that you can bet
> on.

Where can I place that bet? I could pay off my house!


> You are now killfiled.

Well it's about ****ing time! (Oh... given your rather exotic interests,
maybe "****ing" isn't the best word to use.. .might give you ideas...)

I doubt that you REALLY have me killfiled. You read my writings too avidly
to give it up that easily. (Of course, that's not your WORST habit, is it?)

Bob

On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:15:55 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
<virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:

>Stu wrote:
>
>> Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing kids.
>
>If the shoe fits, wear it.
>
>
>> I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
>> agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
>> mistaken.
>
>*yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.


Not killfiled as yet so I will reply to this. You Bob need to actually
read what your constitution says about your right to free speech. It
doesn't cover you for the eighteen posts I have of yours.

Stu wrote:

>>*yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.
>
> Not killfiled as yet so I will reply to this.

So when you wrote, "You are now killfiled," you were lying. Right, Chester?


> You Bob need to actually read what your constitution says about your right
> to free speech. It doesn't cover you for the eighteen posts I have of
> yours.

I have nothing to fear, Kinko. Do your worst, and I will continue to laugh
at your impotence.

Bob

On 24-May-2010, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:

> Stu wrote:
>
> > Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing kids.
>
> If the shoe fits, wear it.
>
>
> > I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
> > agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
> > mistaken.
>
> *yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.
>
>
> > They will open an investigation after reading your posts, that you can
> > bet
> > on.
>
> Where can I place that bet? I could pay off my house!

Since you are sure nothing will come of it, tell him to which state AG to
send the complaint.
--
Kent Brockman, multi-award winning anchor

"Stu" <[email protected]> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:[email protected]..

>>> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
>>> contact the AG in that state.

>>You mewl out empty threat after empty threat, and nothing comes of it.
>>Your
>>impotence is hilarious.

> Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing
> kids.

****, I missed that recipe!

> You are now killfiled.

LOL

On May 24, 1:15*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz>
wrote:
> Stu wrote:
> > Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing kids..
>
> If the shoe fits, wear it.
>
> > I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
> > agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
> > mistaken.
>
> *yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.
>

If he can prove it is libel, then you would have a problem.

I'm not on either side as I have no idea where the claim comes from.
But if it is a false claim, the amount of times you have stated it
would be far more than just a joke. People searching the internet
would be able to find it and there could be a good case for libel.

It's not something I would joke about or use as an insult in an
archived list unless I knew I could prove it.

In article <[email protected]>,
Stu <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:15:55 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:
>
> >Stu wrote:
> >
> >> Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing kids.
> >
> >If the shoe fits, wear it.
> >
> >
> >> I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
> >> agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
> >> mistaken.
> >
> >*yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.
>
>
> Not killfiled as yet so I will reply to this. You Bob need to actually
> read what your constitution says about your right to free speech. It
> doesn't cover you for the eighteen posts I have of yours.

Libel happens to be against the law.
Even on usenet...

You, Mr. Terwillinger, are in deep **** my dear. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine

In article <4bfaebe8$0$32083$[email protected]>,
"Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz> wrote:

> Stu wrote:
>
> >>*yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.
> >
> > Not killfiled as yet so I will reply to this.
>
> So when you wrote, "You are now killfiled," you were lying. Right, Chester?
>
>
> > You Bob need to actually read what your constitution says about your right
> > to free speech. It doesn't cover you for the eighteen posts I have of
> > yours.
>
> I have nothing to fear, Kinko. Do your worst, and I will continue to laugh
> at your impotence.
>
> Bob

I may join him.

I can use the money.
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

[email protected] wrote:
> On May 24, 1:15 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die_spammer.biz>
> wrote:
>> Stu wrote:
>>> Realize this Bob, you broke the law when you accused me of ****ing
>>> kids.
>>
>> If the shoe fits, wear it.
>>
>>> I'm sure the AG will send my complaint to the appropriate
>>> agency, and if you think I'm not going to send it you're badly
>>> mistaken.
>>
>> *yawn* We have free speech in *this* country, Padre.
>>
>
> If he can prove it is libel, then you would have a problem.
>
> I'm not on either side as I have no idea where the claim comes from.
> But if it is a false claim, the amount of times you have stated it
> would be far more than just a joke. People searching the internet
> would be able to find it and there could be a good case for libel.

I imagine that one person posting under a pen name making
comments about another person who doesn't post their name
either would not have much to worry about. What do I know.

nancy

Om wrote:

>> If he can prove it is libel, then you would have a problem.
>
> Yes he does. These posts are archived so they won't be hard to prove.
> I'm considering joining in on this.

You are completely ignorant of what the term "libel" means, aren't you? Just
add that to the list of things about which you are ignorant: stalker,
Tex-Mex, cooking, life...


> Bob is in deep trouble. And he deserves it. <g>

Don't sing it -- BRING IT!

But you can't, and you know it. This is just more bluster, with nothing to
back it up.

Bob

Om wrote:

> Libel happens to be against the law.
> Even on usenet...

Sure, but what I've done doesn't meet the legal definition of libel. If you
weren't so ignorant, you'd know that.


> You, Mr. Terwillinger, are in deep **** my dear. ;-)

Blah, blah, blah... Bull****. You are simply full of it.

Bob

Om wrote:

>> I have nothing to fear, Kinko. Do your worst, and I will continue to
>> laugh at your impotence.
>
> I may join him.
>
> I can use the money.

Throw away your entire life savings in a legal crusade against me, if you
feel so devout about it. It would just show you to be more of a fool than
you've already shown.

As I said before, I have nothing to fear. I *do* have something to laugh
about, though!

Bob

On May 24, 11:34*am, Stu <i...@foodforu.ca> wrote:
> Anyone know what state Bob Terwilliger lives in? I need this info to
> contact the AG in that state

Who cares...can't contribute a moment of value. ...bless his heart.