Anyone game for RFC 'chat'?

Just like the subject line says <G> - anyone game for RFC chat? The
'scoop' about RFC chat can be found here:

http://www.recfoodcooking.com/chat.html

or/and here

http://www.recfoodcooking.com/webchat.html

Sky, who's suffering a case of yap-yaps, again <G>!!

P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D

--
Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!!

Sky wrote:
>
> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D

You should only post to the mailing list of people who
actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.

Mark Thorson wrote:
> Sky wrote:
>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>
> You should only post to the mailing list of people who
> actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
> the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.

It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
participants in this group.

Dave Smith wrote:
>
> Mark Thorson wrote:
> > Sky wrote:
> >> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
> >
> > You should only post to the mailing list of people who
> > actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
> > the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
>
> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
> participants in this group.

You can be sure this posting will be archived
on the mailing list of people who find
Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
list, you can take that to the bank!

Mark Thorson wrote:

>>>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>>> You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>>> actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>>> the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
>> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
>> participants in this group.
>
> You can be sure this posting will be archived
> on the mailing list of people who find
> Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
> list, you can take that to the bank!

Oh good for you to moderator of a group. Just remember that it is not
RFC, so you have no business telling other people not to invite others
not to participate in chat. Yours will be a small group of the elite
forks who scour ebay looking for objects they can't identify and recipes
calling for food grade butane.

Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:4b128508$0$1599
$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com:

> Mark Thorson wrote:
>
>>>>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>>>> You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>>>> actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>>>> the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
>>> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
>>> participants in this group.
>>
>> You can be sure this posting will be archived
>> on the mailing list of people who find
>> Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
>> list, you can take that to the bank!
>
> Oh good for you to moderator of a group. Just remember that it is not
> RFC, so you have no business telling other people not to invite others
> not to participate in chat. Yours will be a small group of the elite
> forks who scour ebay looking for objects they can't identify and
recipes
> calling for food grade butane.


Thorson has been on the "mental" rag as long as we've known him.

Andy

Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:4b128508$0$1599
$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com:

>> You can be sure this posting will be archived
>> on the mailing list of people who find
>> Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
>> list, you can take that to the bank!
>
> Oh good for you to moderator of a group. Just remember that it is not
> RFC, so you have no business telling other people not to invite others
> not to participate in chat.

Dave is right. The long-lost hall monitor shtick is *so* last century
back.

--

“Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid
people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative.”

-John Stuart Mill

Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> wrote in
news:4B121187.2B21399A@sonic.net:

> Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> Mark Thorson wrote:
>> > Sky wrote:
>> >> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>> >
>> > You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>> > actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>> > the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
>>
>> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
>> participants in this group.
>
> You can be sure this posting will be archived
> on the mailing list of people who find
> Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
> list, you can take that to the bank!


Poor Thorson.

You actually moderate a mailing list of "people who find Dave Smith
annoying" all by your lonesome?

I imagine you're also it's only member!

LOLOL!!!

Andy

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:56:09 -0600, Andy <a@b.c> wrote:

-->Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> wrote in
-->news:4B121187.2B21399A@sonic.net:
-->
-->> Dave Smith wrote:
-->>>
-->>> Mark Thorson wrote:
-->>> > Sky wrote:
-->>> >> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
-->>> >
-->>> > You should only post to the mailing list of people who
-->>> > actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
-->>> > the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
-->>>
-->>> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
-->>> participants in this group.
-->>
-->> You can be sure this posting will be archived
-->> on the mailing list of people who find
-->> Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
-->> list, you can take that to the bank!
-->
-->
-->Poor Thorson.
-->
-->You actually moderate a mailing list of "people who find Dave Smith
-->annoying" all by your lonesome?
-->
-->I imagine you're also it's only member!
-->
-->LOLOL!!!
-->
-->Andy

Actually, when a moderator starts doing things like this, the people on the
list can vote him off.

Stu <ffu@foodforu.ca> wrote in
news:lo65h5l5l77srl8fkmd7a306dibk9k59d1@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:56:09 -0600, Andy <a@b.c> wrote:
>
> -->Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> wrote in
> -->news:4B121187.2B21399A@sonic.net:
> -->
> -->> Dave Smith wrote:
> -->>>
> -->>> Mark Thorson wrote:
> -->>> > Sky wrote:
> -->>> >> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame
> away!! ;D -->>> >
> -->>> > You should only post to the mailing list of people who
> -->>> > actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
> -->>> > the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
> -->>>
> -->>> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for
> the -->>> participants in this group.
> -->>
> -->> You can be sure this posting will be archived
> -->> on the mailing list of people who find
> -->> Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
> -->> list, you can take that to the bank!
> -->
> -->
> -->Poor Thorson.
> -->
> -->You actually moderate a mailing list of "people who find Dave Smith
> -->annoying" all by your lonesome?
> -->
> -->I imagine you're also it's only member!
> -->
> -->LOLOL!!!
> -->
> -->Andy
>
> Actually, when a moderator starts doing things like this, the people
> on the list can vote him off.


The world is full of cheap shooters! How they advance their cause defies
logic.

Andy

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800, Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net>
wrote:

>Sky wrote:
>>
>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>
>You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.

I don't do chat but it seems if folks here want to try to get together
it doesn't seem like it's an issue to announce it especially with all
the other nonsense that get's posted here. There's a page on the RFC
site with directions to get there so there must be some interest in
it.

Lou

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:14:31 -0600, Lou Decruss
<LouDecruss@biteme.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800, Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Sky wrote:
>>>
>>> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
>>
>>You should only post to the mailing list of people who
>>actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
>>the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
>
>I don't do chat but it seems if folks here want to try to get together
>it doesn't seem like it's an issue to announce it especially with all
>the other nonsense that get's posted here. There's a page on the RFC
>site with directions to get there so there must be some interest in
>it.
>

Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.

brooklyn1 wrote:


> Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
> and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
> chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
> in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
> sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
> your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.


I don't do the chat thing very often, maybe once every month or two. I
have encountered a lot of the regular posters in there. Sometimes there
is no one there, so a post suggesting that someone is there are relevant
to the group.

I don't know what your paranoia is based on. I have never seen anything
in chat they someone would have to be worried about being called on later.

AFAIAC, chat suggestions and invitations are no less OT the the OP's all
too frequent posts about his obsession with finding unidentified kitchen
gadgets on eBay. Moreover, it is an unmoderated newsgroup, so he has no
business chiding someone else over the content of their posts. Maybe he
shiould just stick to finding a source for food grade propane.

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:19:15 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>
>> Directions are there so they don't need to be posted to the Newsgroup
>> and for no other reason whatsoever... nor should anything regarding
>> chat be posted to the Newsgroup... what happens in chat needs to stay
>> in chat. That's why the Chat is not safe, nothing said there is
>> sacred, and as far as I know nothing said there is logged... so go lie
>> your lonely-loser psychotic heads off.
>
>
>I don't do the chat thing very often, maybe once every month or two. I
>have encountered a lot of the regular posters in there. Sometimes there
>is no one there, so a post suggesting that someone is there are relevant
>to the group.

No it's not relevant, it's just being a gossip, and indicates that
whatever is said there will be blabbed... it's no ones business who
frequents chat.

"Sky" wrote

> Just like the subject line says <G> - anyone game for RFC chat? The
> 'scoop' about RFC chat can be found here:

> Sky, who's suffering a case of yap-yaps, again <G>!!

Had a ball last night! Was happy to see a nightowl conference for a change.

"Sky" wrote

> Just like the subject line says <G> - anyone game for RFC chat? The
> 'scoop' about RFC chat can be found here:

> Sky, who's suffering a case of yap-yaps, again <G>!!

Had a ball last night! Was happy to see a nightowl conference for a change.

"Sky" wrote

> Just like the subject line says <G> - anyone game for RFC chat? The
> 'scoop' about RFC chat can be found here:

> Sky, who's suffering a case of yap-yaps, again <G>!!

Had a ball last night! Was happy to see a nightowl conference for a change.

"Sky" wrote

> Just like the subject line says <G> - anyone game for RFC chat? The
> 'scoop' about RFC chat can be found here:

> Sky, who's suffering a case of yap-yaps, again <G>!!

Had a ball last night! Was happy to see a nightowl conference for a change.

"Lou Decruss" wrote

> I don't do chat but it seems if folks here want to try to get together
> it doesn't seem like it's an issue to announce it especially with all
> the other nonsense that get's posted here. There's a page on the RFC
> site with directions to get there so there must be some interest in
> it.

There is Lou. It lets those of us know who like to chat, that someone is in
there. Thats all it is. Last night was pretty fun when 3 of us ladies
ganged up on the poor Oz fellow in there. 3 against one (grin). Some
serious stuff too, but mostly just fun.

Andy wrote:
>
> Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> wrote in
> news:4B121187.2B21399A@sonic.net:
>
> > Dave Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> Mark Thorson wrote:
> >> > Sky wrote:
> >> >> P.S. Any comments from the peanuts galleries??? Flame away!! ;D
> >> >
> >> > You should only post to the mailing list of people who
> >> > actually participate in chat. Please don't post to
> >> > the whole newsgroup. That's impolite.
> >>
> >> It is impolite of you to acts as net nanny. Chat is a forum for the
> >> participants in this group.
> >
> > You can be sure this posting will be archived
> > on the mailing list of people who find
> > Dave Smith annoying. As moderator of that
> > list, you can take that to the bank!
>
> Poor Thorson.
>
> You actually moderate a mailing list of "people who find Dave Smith
> annoying" all by your lonesome?
>
> I imagine you're also it's only member!

No, there are currently 85 members. Oddly,
the mailing list for people who find Andy annoying
has only 7 members, counting myself. I suppose
you just aren't that interesting, Andy. :-)