On Jul 31, 2:11*pm, Greg Esres <ges...@boundvortex.com> wrote:
Greg wrote:

> BTW, I noticed that you made no attempt to refute the data he posted
> in response to your original post. *That leads me to believe that you
> consider it accurate.

No, not at all . . . I report on health news. So, if this list of
Mark's came out tomorrow in a new press release with updated facts and
peer-reviewed science behind it, I'd report THAT list. In the world of
cancer research, I've become used to the fact that Doc's never agree
with one another. As someone else said better than I in this thread
earlier, no one can agree on what causes cancer and what doesn't. At
some point, you have to think that it is the LABORATORY that gives
laboratory rats cancer.

I'd tend to place a high regard on people at Kansas State University,
though, as they know an awful lot about grilled meats in Kansas! Ever
eaten any Kansas City BBQ? They probably have state government funding
for their research on marinades in Kansas, of all places.

Actually, what you point out IS a problem with Mark. Because he comes
up with generally valid comments, but covers them in oddball
accusations of (pick one) "spam" or "scientology", you get distracted
from his message by the name calling. He's done this for years.

Dave