On Jul 31, 2:11*pm, Greg Esres <ges...@boundvortex.com> wrote:
Greg wrote:

> BTW, I noticed that you made no attempt to refute the data he posted
> in response to your original post. *That leads me to believe that you
> consider it accurate.

As I mentioned, some of what Mark says is valuable, but he ends up
losing friends everywhere he goes because he tries to censor others.
Just another usenet bully, and there are a lot of those. In the case
of his data posted in response to my original, it all got lost in the
fact that he started into his name-calling again. Actually, I'd seen
that listed posted before on the Internet, probably by Mark. Is it
accurate? In the case of cancer, WHO KNOWS. Cancer is still a great
big mystery box. Personally, I'd take the word of researchers from
Kansas State University (they know about grilled meat in Kansas!) over
some list of information provided by a Usenet poster who makes mixed
accusations of spam or scientology (take your pick) every where he
goes.

Dave